Search results

Brother, The answer to Q37b) is wrongly stated. The reasons being: Greater bandwidth Less attenuation Less noise in the coaxial cable

No energy gradient here is Up/r and potential gradient is V/r

Yes, but same way i could have included 1.6 value in the previous for the fundamental charge.

Energy is potential into charge Potential is energy/charge Gradient of potential=energy gradient/charge

They talk abput 1.6x10^-19 as the highest common factor

Jazak Allah for this! Please can you tell me the anwer for Q6)b) part. The answer to this is 3.2x10^-19, why cant it be 1.6x10^-19? http://maxpapers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/9702_s12_qp_42.pdf

What is the question? Can you please attach the paper?

http://maxpapers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/9702_s14_qp_41.pdf But the answer to this Q8) c) is 1.6x10^-19 although it is not in the list given

E= -potential gradient Electric field strength is the negative of gradient of Potential/distance graph

Only the last two values cannot be divided by either 1.6 or 3.2.

Can anyone help me with ths please, Why isn't the answer 1.6x10^-19 for this.

http://maxpapers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/9702_s12_qp_42.pdf Can anyone help with this Q6b) part. Why isn't the ans 1.6x10^-19

Alhamdulillah went quite well.

So how did the paper go?

Prayers. Much needed!

Check in which direction the value of your critical value(For t-test) or x^2(For chi-squared test) proceeds, always check relative to probability 0.05 and by checking the degrees of freedom. If the probability increases (if it proceeds in the direction of increasing probability) then this means...

Allah ke liye zindagi guzar ke tu dekho!