• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Search results

  1. Shoaib idiot boy

    Hey listen let's discuss the p34 physics

    Hey listen let's discuss the p34 physics
  2. Shoaib idiot boy

    Physics Practical 34 (Discussion)

    Let discuss they all have different variants and all the papers are done British council are not fools !!!
  3. Shoaib idiot boy

    Physics Practical 34 (Discussion)

    Yeah I got -3.5*10^-3 gradient and got 9*10^-3 Y-intercept !!!! The relationship proved for me !!!!
  4. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    What did u write for it if u used the kinetic theory then it's right else it's wrong coz it's not an equilibrium condition as no reversible reaction was occuring
  5. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    Wat do u mean appear in planning paper?? Commercial use was for the ester PERFUMES ,FOOD FLAVOURING
  6. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    Yes -129
  7. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    Catalyst one will be right the other temp and pressure one will be wrong
  8. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    Yeah but they were like this don't know about the order but there were these three
  9. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    Yes you are right
  10. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    It is dissolve react react I have had a long discussion with my friends and sir about this they say it's dissolve react react !!!
  11. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    Sorry *wasnt equilibrium
  12. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    No the reaction was not equilibr No the reaction was equilibrium it wasn't a reversible reaction it was a simple reaction so le chatliers law doesn't imply on it u have to simply wrote about collisions and activation energy is come over by high temperature and due to pressure there are higher...
  13. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    Even I did in one it doesn't make any difference they'll give the marks
  14. Shoaib idiot boy

    Chemistry Paper 22: Discussion and Grade Threshold

    What did you guys do for the temperature pressure one???
  15. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

  16. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    Yar we didn't have to do it by le chatliers principle as it wasn't a reversible reaction u had to simply explain it with the kinectic theory of molecules ...I lost 4 marks here!!!
  17. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    It was Dissolve for na and React for the other two confirmed
  18. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    And it was DISSOLVED REACT REACT ? Right ? In the 1st question!!!
  19. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    Enthalpy change was -129 and the last question molecular formula was C3H6O3 in the organic one and u had to make structural groups ...and the emperical formula we had to take out was some what C6H7O7...we were multiplying it with 6 till I remember ...
  20. Shoaib idiot boy

    GT for Chemistry paper 22 AS.

    I did the pressure and temperature thing with the le chatliers principle and co+2h2o=ch3cooh was not a reversible reaction many of my friends did the same mistake!!! Moderator Edit : Avoid Abusive Langauge
Top