Physics, Chemistry and Biology: Post your doubts here!

Messages
446
Reaction score
1,825
Points
153
eureka!

Q) Explain why energy losses in the transmission cables are lower when the voltage is
high.


Ans) high voltage means) low(er) current (but V is directly prop. to R!)
for given supply power
(low(er) current means) less heat/thermal energy (generated in cables) OR P = I2R (?)
for given resistance (of cables)
cables heated by current

Explain...
Suppose you wanna send 4 MW of power through a cable of 4 Ω.
P=IV. You've got many options, e.g. sending 10A at 400 000 V, 160A at 25000 V, etc.
Now, what would the p.d. across the wire be if you deploy the 25 000 V solution?
V=IR; 160 x 4 = 640V
Power lost would be 640 x 160 = 102 400 W, just 2.6% of the 4MW being sent.

Therefore, increasing the voltage reduces p.d. across cable, reducing power lost.
 
Messages
6,440
Reaction score
31,077
Points
698

Okay, we know that Resistance α length/Area.
Since the coil has a diameter half of that the original one → area of the new coil = ¼ Area of the original one.
Which means, keeping length constant, the new resistance should have been R = length/(Area/4) → R = 4length/Area → R = 4(Resistance of original coil) = 4*4 = 16 ohm.

Whereas, the new resistance is actually V/I → 1.8/0.3 = 6 ohm.
Since R α L → ratio of resistances = ratio of lengths → 6/16 * 100 = 37.5%

Hope you get it.
 
Messages
69
Reaction score
76
Points
28
Okay, we know that Resistance α length/Area.
Since the coil has a diameter half of that the original one → area of the new coil = ¼ Area of the original one.
Which means, keeping length constant, the new resistance should have been R = length/(Area/4) → R = 4length/Area → R = 4(Resistance of original coil) = 4*4 = 16 ohm.

Whereas, the new resistance is actually V/I → 1.8/0.3 = 6 ohm.
Since R α L → ratio of resistances = ratio of lengths → 6/16 * 100 = 37.5%

Hope you get it.
THANK YOU
 
Top