-
We need your support!
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Search results
-
-
-
-
Statistics Paper 62 -- How was it?!
It waz easy n wnt good ..i thnk gt will be arund 40- broken angel
- Post #11
- Forum: A-Levels
-
-
How was math paper 62
it wAz really eaxy .... i also hope tht will be abve 40- broken angel
- Post #8
- Forum: A-Levels
-
-
Chem P2: How was it?
Hmmm ..:) I hope thrshld will be low ...:)- broken angel
- Post #38
- Forum: A-Levels
-
-
Chem P2: How was it?
yes it waz dificlt... i suppose othrs r tlkng abut 21- broken angel
- Post #33
- Forum: A-Levels
-
-
-
-
-
-
physics paper 33
u hv n error n improvement suggextn abut heatng expriment ??- broken angel
- Post #154
- Forum: A-Levels
-
physics paper 33
uncertanity doubles in addintn n sbtractn bt halved in tking average- broken angel
- Post #153
- Forum: A-Levels
-
physics paper 33
noooo..!!! in this uncertanity is 0.2 cox both uncrtanitiex will add togethr see!! m saying when we take 2 readings of oscillations n thn tke average here uncertanity ix halved- broken angel
- Post #150
- Forum: A-Levels
-
physics paper 33
parallax error of thrmometer fans n a.c intrpt result- broken angel
- Post #148
- Forum: A-Levels
-
physics paper 33
yes when repeat ou readings js like in time its actualy we r reducing error so whn we take 2 reading for each set n then take average it means uncertanity is reduced to half ..- broken angel
- Post #144
- Forum: A-Levels