HOW WAS CHEMISTRY PAPER 22 ?

[Daniyal23]

Hehe....wAss a quite eAsy paperr...!! well,in my case i did work well...!! im satisfied!!
Expecting between 45-55..!! i think the GT will not be too lOw....comparing with the past papers, this one wAs rAther better....!! CHILL!!

Im too expecting 45-50 range but paper was Comparatively harder than previous papers 2006 onwards so GT should be below 45 imo...

 

[babycry]

I think it was quite easy. Expecting 50-57.

where will u lose marks?

 

[cowarrior]

yeah, organic was quite tricky. hoping to get full marks from that portion.

 

[cowarrior]

where will u lose marks?

Value of x.

 

[ijjukittu]

It was a tricky one!!!..... There were no definitions either

 

[Ba7rani123]

First three questions were sweet.
Organic ticked me off a bit!
But in the end, i managed it!

exactly same comment here

 

[dman7000]

it was normal, but shocked that there was nt a range of topics!
plus organic was tricky and finding the x???!!!

 

[123dawg]

Damn all you smart people, chem really is not my thing i so failed that paper
it was my 11th exam and I have 7 to go so crazy

 

[TCHS]

The organic was weird & tricky :S

 

[Idolfanatic95]

Organic took me half the time. But it went good i guess. What value of x did u ppl get for hydrated zinc sulphate?
And what about that 15mg consumption per day? concentration and mass?

 

[NouranAyman]

Paper overall was easy, just few questions were tricky! The zinc ethanoate one I wanna know the mass and the concentration of zinc ethanoate but after 24 hours! Im scared of paper 1 now, cuz its soo harddd i hope it goes good! and after 24 hourse WE should discuss

 

[balay]

yea that x one.......half the people i knw got 7 and the other half got 3........which 1 is correct?....plus anybody remeber the zinc compounds?

 

[arsalan116]

x was 7..

 

[Kumkum]

yea that x one.......half the people i knw got 7 and the other half got 3........which 1 is correct?....plus anybody remeber the zinc compounds?

i got my x as 7

 

[Iadmireblue]

Do displayed optical isomers have to be in 3D

 

[arsalan116]

Do displayed optical isomers have to be in 3D

i think so

 

[arsalan116]

what were the compounds with no reactions ?

 

[Kumkum]

Do displayed optical isomers have to be in 3D

yes in the chem syllabus it states that candidates should indicate the 3D structures for optical isomers

 

[NouranAyman]

i got x as 3! guys we had to use number of moles like 1:x so 0.03:0.09

 

[switch]

For the last page they asked for displayed formula not 3D , thus the structure drawn does not have to be in 3D
That x question was tricky , I got 7 for it...
That exam was ok , something very different especially the organic chemistry :| , spent so much time learning that organic chapter parrot fashion and was struck by lightning in the paper by having to really interpret those organic compounds as they were not straight forward regurgatation of work studied
Hoping paper 1 will be decent !
Threshold of this paper should be about 45/60 for an A