How Was Bio p33? :)

[Malik777]

I just Found Question two difficult :/

 

[Muddy]

I want to confirm one thing that whether the sucrose was present in s1 or not ? S2 was starch and s3 was glucose ..

 

[Bluejeans#]

yes it was ^_^

 

[Muddy]

yes it was ^_^

no it wasn't .. the colour which I observed was dark brown and there was no sign of green yellow and orange .. it directly came brown ..

 

[afoo.666]

S1 was Sucrose, S2 was Starch and S3 was Glucose.

I want to confirm one thing that whether the sucrose was present in s1 or not ? S2 was starch and s3 was glucose ..

 

[afoo.666]

Same here. What was the ratio?

I just Found Question two difficult :/

 

[ahmed abdulla]

can u tell me the questions came plz ?
it might help me in va. 34 ?
i heard that eye peice graticule and all that stuff cam... right?

 

[Bluejeans#]

no it wasn't .. the colour which I observed was dark brown and there was no sign of green yellow and orange .. it directly came brown ..

omg it was reddish brown :O ?

 

[Muddy]

omg it was reddish brown :O ?

Yupp something like that .. why ? U did any mistake ?

 

[Bluejeans#]

Yupp something like that .. why ? U did any mistake ?

so dat means sucrose is present :/

 

[Kinki Tiffany 12]

What is the comparisons in question 2?

 

[abdul arham]

do

I want to confirm one thing that whether the sucrose was present in s1 or not ? S2 was starch and s3 was glucose ..

dont get tensionized,,........i got brown colour too which shows that it is more heavily concentrated than redd ppt......because brown ppt shows more concentaration than brown ppt........................................

but at my centre.....many got blue colours and many got brown......it depends upon how much u had added NAHCO3 because hcl will not let benedict work until there are some alkaline conditions,.......well i added a spatula full and it worked but if u got a brown ppt and had not identified as sucrose ...then it is wrong ,......

read the colour changes thes might help bro:http://www.biosci.ohiou.edu/introbioslab/Bios170/170_2/benedict.htm

 

[stareaj]

Q2

 

[abdul arham]

microscope was somehow tuff and somehow a piece of cake..................................................................much linency in plan diagrams +easy marking in that graph question....................but the diffrences screwed me as all my all sTORY WAS AROUND VASCULAR BUNDLLE................i got 3 diffrences in their sizwe arrangement and shape,,placement............but wrote many others about cambium which wasnt vissible in one diagram......and parenchema celll

 

[Oceanic]

What say about the GT

 

[ishika1234]

I want to confirm one thing that whether the sucrose was present in s1 or not ? S2 was starch and s3 was glucose ..

s3 was glucose
s2 was starch

 

[ishika1234]

Same here. What was the ratio?

yup. that question was pain in ass
i didnt get any result but my friend told sucrose was present

 

[ahmed abdulla]

microscope was somehow tuff and somehow a piece of cake..................................................................much linency in plan diagrams +easy marking in that graph question....................but the diffrences screwed me as all my all sTORY WAS AROUND VASCULAR BUNDLLE................i got 3 diffrences in their sizwe arrangement and shape,,placement............but wrote many others about cambium which wasnt vissible in one diagram......and parenchema celll

you mean .. eye piece graticule and stage micrometer and all that stuff were there ?
i mean doing them practically .. not as in o/n 2012 where they give you a diagram ... this time you had to do it ???

 

[abdul arham]

yup

 

[abdul arham]

we vwer provided graticule for writing diffeerences about its size as its function vas not given oin question