- Messages
- 419
- Reaction score
- 691
- Points
- 103
the amount of distinction expecters on XPF is too damn high 
🚀 NEW from the xtremepape.rs team: AI exam prep — 150,000+ worked solutions, and it marks your handwritten working from a photo. Sign in with your forum account & try it free → prepare.xtremepape.rs
there's no half marking , man..Yeah, but we'll get 1/2.
there's no half marking , man..
but i got 7.95 :/
me too..but i got 7.95 :/
the amount of distinction expecters on XPF is too damn high![]()
was it 2 marks question ??Umm. By 1/2, I mean 1 out of 2.
which question ??common sense RIP i wrote 2.2 and then found height was 46 and radius 2.2 but time was short so :/ total 3 marks gone in p2![]()
was it 2 marks question ??
konsa ??section b 22 cm wala![]()
yes..100% confirmed???
This line has been used before by kamihus.![]()
If we didn't write center of enlargement as B and just write Origin (0.0).. it is the same right ?Yeah
I
If we didn't write center of enlargement as B and just write Origin (0.0).. it is the same right ?
Man B itself was origin..
I can prove that..
I didn't write center at all. In any case from the alphabets it could easily be guessed what we really had to deduce was the enlargement and scale factor center was obvious.It was enlargement about B with a scale factor of 3,right?
$1.52
You'll get at least 1/2.
🚀 NEW from the xtremepape.rs team: AI exam prep — 150,000+ worked solutions, and it marks your handwritten working from a photo. Sign in with your forum account & try it free → prepare.xtremepape.rs