• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Search results

  1. S

    Chemistry MCQ thread...

    cool, it's ok i got the anion one.. could you please post the yield method? and guys i got pink eye at the last moment, and damn it hurts do pray for all Insha'Allah it'll go well :^D
  2. S

    Chemistry MCQ thread...

    im still confused for Ca(HCO3)2 can elaborate some more, please?
  3. S

    Chemistry MCQ thread...

    dude it's C anyhow no problem just post the method for it
  4. S

    Chemistry MCQ thread...

  5. S

    Chemistry MCQ thread...

    the ans is, C for both
  6. S

    Chemistry MCQ thread...

    Guys, my doubt.. It frigging driving me insane: Nov 2005, Q12 (ans: D) Nov 2006, Q9 (ans: C)
  7. S

    maths p62

    Precisely! The time was deifnitely an issue for me
  8. S

    Currently Listening To?

    Snow Patrol's- Golden floor. It so wanna makes you dance 0(^_^)0
  9. S

    HOW WAS physics 51?????

    dude i think you're talking about 52?
  10. S

    Chemistry Paper4 discussion

    Okay peeps, It's much easier to follow this way. Get down your doubts and troubles together and lets get cracking I'll do the honours and start with my dispute which atm is with Q8 from June 2009, part c) ii)
  11. S

    HOW WAS physics 51?????

    screwed up the error in the table and the last bit, but overall it was 'Alhamdulillah' a fine paper indeed
  12. S

    physics p5 discussion

    Oh apologies I got immersed in the past papers. Vo= (5.2-4.8 )/2= 0.2 Io= (15.2-14.8 )/2= 0.2 (0.2+0.2)x 333=133.2 but mark scheme says +/-20 for the first column
  13. S

    physics p5 discussion

    uncertainity in the table for Xc yaar this is what mark scheme had but i dont know how to get these ± 20 (allow ± 17 or 18 or 19), decreasing to ± 10 (allow ± 7)
  14. S

    physics p5 discussion

    Ok GUYS June 2010 uncertainity in Xc, Jaldiiiii?
  15. S

    physics p5 discussion

    I agree! and I too at first didn't use it but then i wasnt getting the answer i wanted(as per the mark scheme) so however ans whatever is mentioned, It is the information provided to us, that's gotta be taken into account by the way what did you guys get for Nov 2010/53 Q2 (d) and how?
  16. S

    Currently Listening To?

    DK Bose- Delhi Belly effing awesome song yaar
  17. S

    physics p5 discussion

    Gradient: 54.8+/-5.6 (this is when I divided the error into 2, like my error was 0.06 so i took the 3boxes above the dot and 3 below. how about you?) n: -0.00485+/-0.0005 x: 0.042+/- 0.004 @workinghard grapghs for the best fit for years, Nov 2009(52), Nov 2010(52) and June 2010(51) the dots...
  18. S

    physics p5 discussion

    he's right, about finding the y intercept.. and as for Nov/2009: I did it this way lgG=hlgT-lgR so, lgG=(-4.2)(2.496)-2.88 lgG=-13.4 Bring it on peeps, how did guys you do it?
  19. S

    physics p5 discussion

    okay my best fit line was flawless so far till i reached Nov 2009(52) and the points just refuse to lie in a straight line, HELP! and guys do upload a few graphs of yours so we get to understand better, the error bars and stuff Posting my doubts again, In hope that someone would reply -Nov...
  20. S

    physics p5 discussion

    Guys respond to my query on page 5, I cant do any further and it's freaking me out yaar
Top