We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
it balanced on 85650i don't remember.
my balancing figure was 76560
really?? my answer is wrong!it balanced on 85650
It's not important sweety. Some of my friends got what you got, no one knows the exact answers so anyone could be right.really?? my answer is wrong!
I got 75650 Even my answer is wrong :'(it balanced on 85650
u think so, honey?It's not important sweety. Some of my friends got what you got, no one knows the exact answers so anyone could be right.
i think it's matchingwhich accounting concept was broken by:
1) Charging the complete cost of non-current assets to the income statement of the year of purchase
i'm not sure if my answer was 76560 or 75650. but i'm sure the first number was 7.I got 75650 Even my answer is wrong :'(
Yes u righti think it's matching
i've never heard of this concept.Yes u right
But can we also fit the concept if Materiality in this??
Since we did not treat the non-current assets as an asset but as an expense so we can say that we did not consider it material
I wrote matching first but in last 2 mins i cut it and wrote materiality
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now