- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 10
- Points
- 13
how did the paper go guys??
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
It was good, what do you think?how did the paper go guys??
It was good, what do you think?
I feel it was one of these papers.
Yeah same, calculations did take some of my time!what did you get for the mass of anhydrous calcium chloride? honestly the whole thing was easy bas i took some time for the calculations.
did you have to give the mass to 2 d.p? i gave it to 1i got the same as well its right im sure
i gave it to one as well
I gave it to 2 dp since the balance measures up to 2 decimal places... Idk, I think either ways are correctdid you have to give the mass to 2 d.p? i gave it to 1
wht did u write fr y the student ddnt take reading at 3min??I gave it to 2 dp in the since the balance measures up to 2 decimal places... Idk, I think either ways are correct
I wrote that the reaction has just started, and the increase in temperature was rapid, so it was hard to determine one certain value at 3 min.wht did u write fr y the student ddnt take reading at 3min??
n the other question similar to ths..
I wrote that the reaction has just started, and the increase in temperature was rapid, so it was hard to determine one certain value at 3 min.
And to why he took from 0-2 min, to measure the initial temperature and ensure a constant temperature.
Wbu?
Its okay, it was just for one mark, so one point is more than enoughi wrote, the CaCl2 was added at tht tym
n yh 2 make sure temp was constant. i missed the point of initial temp :/
Its okay, it was just for one mark, so one point is more than enough
What did you write for the 10cm glass cell into 20cm glass cell?
What did you write for the 10cm glass cell into 20cm glass cell?
I doubled it, it was 5.05... I made it as 10.1the same value..dnt rem wht it was
cux the angle was just dependent on conc of sucrose
wbu..
I doubled it, it was 5.05... I made it as 10.1
Thats because the depth decreases, and the saturation of particles increases therefore it doubles
Well, logically both could be right...oh.. i thnk u cud b ryt
Well, logically both could be right...
Lets see what happens
What did people in your centre say about the difficulty of the paper?
Yeah :/no i thnk urs is ryt..it makes sense
many thought it was gud bt thn it happens tht ppl thnk their ans is ryt bt thn later they fynd its nt
lyk i did jst nw xd
Yeah :/
Oh, its okay, we all did some mistakes here and there, lets hope the gt goes down and we get A*s
You are aiming for?
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now