How did physics 33 go??

[sasuke474]

It was such a good paper. I'm thanking Allah for blessing me today.

Since you're so blessed please make dua for the rest of us ))) maybe yours will be accepted

 

[danial 234]

All of you are so cool saying how awful your papers were, in my school all the nerds are like "i think I'll get 39/40" lmao.
And did anyone else's school have sh*tty apparatus? The ammeter and the useless wires made it impossible for me to finish the paper

exactly same situation here...
and my fellows were saying that they will get 35+ :O

 

[sasuke474]

Guys they were equal right..
The values of k.. And what did u guys get for ur gradients

They were, but did you write about why they were within limits? It has something to do with % uncertainty i think, didnt write tho

 

[sasuke474]

exactly same situation here...
and my fellows were saying that they will get 35+ :O

People like that ruin the curve. i mean the paper was made by monkeys why should we suffer?

 

[Princess Raven]

They were, but did you write about why they were within limits? It has something to do with % uncertainty i think, didnt write tho

Yea u have to calculate the percentage error and if it's less than 10% u say that the relationship is correct I got the error to be only like 0.6% my
Values of both Ks were so close but my gradient was the weirdest :/

 

[sasuke474]

Yea u have to calculate the percentage error and if it's less than 10% u say that the relationship is correct I got the error to be only like 0.6% my
Values of both Ks were so close but my gradient was the weirdest :/

It was only one mark i think and they expect all that There's a special place in hell for these CIE people i'm sure

 

[sasuke474]

Yea u have to calculate the percentage error and if it's less than 10% u say that the relationship is correct I got the error to be only like 0.6% my
Values of both Ks were so close but my gradient was the weirdest :/

THERE WAS NO GRAPH IN THAT EXPERIMENT WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT???? IM SCARED NOW

 

[unknown1996]

so who got his gradient negative and who got it postive in varrient 33 ???

 

[Princess Raven]

THERE WAS NO GRAPH IN THAT EXPERIMENT WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT???? IM SCARED NOW

No no I am talking about question 1

 

[sasuke474]

It was surely negative

I forgot the minus sign, whole mark lost?

 

[Princess Raven]

so who got his gradient negative and who got it postive in varrient 33 ???

It was negative

 

[Princess Raven]

Got small percentage difference so supported the statement. Gradients was about 2*10^-4

Wow okay I got -35 LOOL! Haha your one makes more sense lol

 

[Kamihus]

Wow okay I got -35 LOOL! Haha your one makes more sense lol

It can be depend on whether you take cm or m in the lengths.

 

[Princess Raven]

It can be depend on whether you take cm or m in the lengths.

U have to have it in SI Units don't u?

 

[Kamihus]

U have to have it in SI Units don't u?

I used mA and cm

 

[Princess Raven]

Okay that's probably why.. I used A and m haha

I used mA and cm

 

[danial 234]

Wow okay I got -35 LOOL! Haha your one makes more sense
lol

i got -45 :O :O :/

 

[danial 234]

i used mA and metre

 

[princessnoor]

i got -0.33 gradient and 19.05 y intercept, i hope thts correct may b in the range?
and also wht about limitations and improvements in question 2?

 

[kitkat <3 :P]

i used metres and amperes :/