hmm what about isoquant question
It was something about point G not lying on the isoquant but resulting in same quantity of output and answer was i guess technical disecononies of scale.
yes ot did but i think X efficency is not correct
wait maybe it might be corect
Mhalvi you must be genius " you still remember the questions
haha no it is not like that at least not in Eco as I am a science student![]()
well i guess sadly it is correct, it is concerned with efficency and since our isoquant was shifting outwards it implies higher costs less efficency meaning increase in X inefficency. check out wikipedia page
well i guess sadly it is correct, it is concerned with efficency and since our isoquant was shifting outwards it implies higher costs less efficency meaning increase in X inefficency. check out wikipedia page
well i guess sadly it is correct, it is concerned with efficency and since our isoquant was shifting outwards it implies higher costs less efficency meaning increase in X inefficency. check out wikipedia page