How was Physics P42

[good man12]

So how was it, i found it easy, Alhamdulilah it went well. GT may be A=62-64

 

[Pals_1010]

It was easy

 

[alcoholic 111]

paper went pretty well
Unexpectedly the paper was way too easy compared to recent past papers
GT may be between 60 - 65 ( for A grade )
It should be higher that the previous years

 

[babycry]

very difficult

 

[cpowys]

60-65 percent or out of , what was the maximum mark again?

 

[alcoholic 111]

very difficult

sarcastic ?

60-65 percent or out of , what was the maximum mark again?

Maximum marks were 100
60-65 will make A grade I guess

 

[Saloon]

Was expecting more calculations ...

 

[Mukit-ul Islam]

walk in the park.....that was NOT an A-level paper. Disappointed at Cambridge.

 

[alcoholic 111]

walk in the park.....that was NOT an A-level paper. Disappointed at Cambridge.

Lol you never know dude their grading criteria is quite strict. If one wants marks then he/she has to stick to their marking scheme .

 

[alcoholic 111]

Was expecting more calculations ...

True that ^

 

[good man12]

well i guess GT wont cross 65 no matter how tough it was!!!! thats what the past suggests, but it was a piece of cake, i was done in a record 57minites........any one beat me?????

 

[akshay.RONALDO]

shit, should have scored full marks for such a paper!! :"( something went wrong for two parts. Btw, can anyone inbox me a msg of how the graph for the opamp comparator should be?

 

[cpowys]

well i guess GT wont cross 65 no matter how tough it was!!!! thats what the past suggests, but it was a piece of cake, i was done in a record 57minites........any one beat me?????

I think I had like an hour to go over. The thing about physics is that you think you have a question right but you end up getting a half or 3 quarters of it only and then you get some wrong as well.

 

[Daniyal23]

Paper was very easy...Can gt cross 70? Cuz it was very easy and straight forward..

 

[good man12]

I think I had like an hour to go over. The thing about physics is that you think you have a question right but you end up getting a half or 3 quarters of it only and then you get some wrong as well.

hahaha, thats why i ended up checking every part like i was re solving the paper!!!

 

[good man12]

Paper was very easy...Can gt cross 70? Cuz it was very easy and straight forward..

well considering that every one has had a good paper and my friend who got a C in physics in AS is expecting lik 65 in this paper, the GT may be between 65-68,,,not more!!!!! in physics at times we loose marks for wrong sig fig even though ans were correct....., so GT cant reach that high

 

[cpowys]

well considering that every one has had a good paper and my friend who got a C in physics in AS is expecting lik 65 in this paper, the GT may be between 65-68,,,not more!!!!! in physics at times we loose marks for wrong sig fig even though ans were correct....., so GT cant reach that high

How many actual calculations were there compared to written answers and I thought you only got deducted for sig figs once.

 

[good man12]

How many actual calculations were there compared to written answers and I thought you only got deducted for sig figs once.

nopex, thats only in maths, in physics when ever ur ans isnt exactly as it is on marking scheme, i accuracy mark is deducted, thats why on the paper they write 4.00 instead of 4 in the data, so u keep ur ans to same numb of sig fig,,, there were very few calculations!!!!

 

[cpowys]

nopex, thats only in maths, in physics when ever ur ans isnt exactly as it is on marking scheme, i accuracy mark is deducted, thats why on the paper they write 4.00 instead of 4 in the data, so u keep ur ans to same numb of sig fig,,, there were very few calculations!!!!

Also I did maths 32 what is up with this math got harder and physics got easier!

 

[good man12]

Also I did maths 32 what is up with this math got harder and physics got easier!

oh yeah, dont remind me of math 32......cambridge annihilated like 99% of candidates wit that paper,GT A=50 for sure...