Lets Wrap up Pakistan Studies and Islamiat, those who are appearing in May/June 2014 session

[Syed Mustafa.1.1]

This thread I have made for those who are appearing in May/June 2014 session.. others may seek help from here.

I know there is already a thread for P.st Islamiat and urdu..
https://www.xtremepapers.com/commun...slamiyat-and-urdu-post-your-doubts-here.4055/

I just found it difficult going through the whole thread for collecting notes (but yes, it is useful).

Here if anyone have queries regarding Pakistan studies and Islamiat.. you may post them here..
we will surely try to help you out..

I, myself is appearing for these papers and i think I am done with ALMOST all the preparations.
so I think i can answer to your queries..

 

[Syed Mustafa.1.1]

So here are few of the Questions from History section 1...
Can anyone answer?
1.Why were there succession disputes after the death of Aurangzeb in 1707? /7
2. Why were British able to replace the Mughals as the dominant force in sub continent? /7
3. Why did the mughals have to face so many rebellions during their rule? /7

 

[Ahmed khan 98]

Answer for the question one may include the following points:
a) aurangzeb did not nominated any one as to be the ruler after him.
b) the rulers that came after him were not strong enough to maintain their power and the disturbance caused due to rebellions throughout the country by other rulers were a major cause for the succession disputes bcz all the local rulers wanted to establish themselves as the emperor.
c) due to these disputes the strength of the empire weakened and it caused the decline of the empire as there was increasing hatred between the local rulers and they fought amongst themselves and made further inroads towards disputes and succession wars.

check whether the 3rd point is correct. Or if you may want to include any further relevant points , so plz do so.

 

[Syed Mustafa.1.1]

Answer for the question one may include the following points:
a) aurangzeb did not nominated any one as to be the ruler after him.
b) the rulers that came after him were not strong enough to maintain their power and the disturbance caused due to rebellions throughout the country by other rulers were a major cause for the succession disputes bcz all the local rulers wanted to establish themselves as the emperor.
c) due to these disputes the strength of the empire weakened and it caused the decline of the empire as there was increasing hatred between the local rulers and they fought amongst themselves and made further inroads towards disputes and succession wars.

check whether the 3rd point is correct. Or if you may want to include any further relevant points , so plz do so.

Bro.. you didnt understand the question to some extent...
As it asks only about " WHY were there disputes"

I agree with your First point..
and the second too, but include the "greed of wealth" too in that point
the third point you said is referring to the decline of mughal empire which is not what the Question asks for..

I guess the third point could be..
:- The instigation of mischief chiefs who misguided the successors led to the Disputes among the heirs..

 

[Syed Mustafa.1.1]

Answer for the question one may include the following points:
a) aurangzeb did not nominated any one as to be the ruler after him.
b) the rulers that came after him were not strong enough to maintain their power and the disturbance caused due to rebellions throughout the country by other rulers were a major cause for the succession disputes bcz all the local rulers wanted to establish themselves as the emperor.
c) due to these disputes the strength of the empire weakened and it caused the decline of the empire as there was increasing hatred between the local rulers and they fought amongst themselves and made further inroads towards disputes and succession wars.

check whether the 3rd point is correct. Or if you may want to include any further relevant points , so plz do so.

Try to answer rest of them too...
And you may ask if you have problem in any of the two subjects..

 

[danialtt]

So here are few of the Questions from History section 1...
Can anyone answer?
1.Why were there succession disputes after the death of Aurangzeb in 1707? /7
2. Why were British able to replace the Mughals as the dominant force in sub continent? /7
3. Why did the mughals have to face so many rebellions during their rule? /7

q1 . -aurangzeb did not nominate any successor
-every successor wanted power
-people also wanted to see their beloved princes(aurangzeb's sons) as rulers causing further disputes

 

[Ahmed khan 98]

Question 2 may have the following references:
a) they were superior in technology and had the latest weapons to establish their rule and dominate.
b) British were the super power at that time in the world and they had the resources to make inroads into India and gradually establish themselves as the masters of India through wise political measures taken by them. The British government also backed the eic armed forces and gave them full support to develope in india and provide a platform to enter India in order to take control.
c) mughals had weakened themselves due to succession disputes. and the fact that no able enough ruler came after aurangzeb to handle the affairs of the empire effectively made a clear way for the British to slowly and gradually take over India from the mughals.

3 are enough. your feedback mustafa

 

[Syed Mustafa.1.1]

so in the end we have the following reasons for it..
1.Why were there succession disputes after the death of Aurangzeb in 1707? /7

1. aurangzeb did not nominated any one as to be the ruler after him.
   
2. 1.greed and ambition of power of the candidates
   
3. .The instigation of mischief chiefs who misguided the successors led to the Disputes among the heirs.
   
4. -people also wanted to see their beloved princes(aurangzeb's sons) as rulers causing further disputes
   

 

[Syed Mustafa.1.1]

Question 2 may have the following references:
a) they were superior in technology and had the latest weapons to establish their rule and dominate.
b) British were the super power at that time in the world and they had the resources to make inroads into India and gradually establish themselves as the masters of India through wise political measures taken by them. The British government also backed the eic armed forces and gave them full support to develope in india and provide a platform to enter India in order to take control.
c) mughals had weakened themselves due to succession disputes. and the fact that no able enough ruler came after aurangzeb to handle the affairs of the empire effectively made a clear way for the British to slowly and gradually take over India from the mughals.

3 are enough. your feedback mustafa

Thats a proper answer..
and yess 3 reasons are enough..

 

[Ahmed khan 98]

q1 . -aurangzeb did not nominate any successor
-every successor wanted power
-people also wanted to see their beloved princes(aurangzeb's sons) as rulers causing further disputes

the 3rd point shall be explained as," that due to the different likings of different people regarding as to whom should be the king, caused differences in opinions amongst the people and they fought each other to support their candidates to the throne. This restlessness and in-fighting in the empire caused succession disputes after aurangzebs death".

 

[Syed Mustafa.1.1]

the 3rd point shall be explained as," that due to the different likings of different people regarding as to whom should be the king, caused differences in opinions amongst the people and they fought each other to support their candidates to the throne. This restlessness and in-fighting in the empire caused succession disputes after aurangzebs death".

Very well explained..!!

 

[Ahmed khan 98]

1.Why were there succession disputes after the death of Aurangzeb in 1707? /7

1. aurangzeb did not nominated any one as to be the ruler after him.
   
2. 1.greed and ambition of power of the candidates
   
3. .The instigation of mischief chiefs who misguided the successors led to the Disputes among the heirs.
   
4. -people also wanted to see their beloved princes(aurangzeb's sons) as rulers causing further disputes.

PERFECT JUST AS IT GOES

 

[Ahmed khan 98]

Q.3 MAIN MUGHALS KAY KIS PERIOD KAY BARAY MAIN BATANA HAI, AURANGZEB OR POST- AURANGZEB PERIOD!!!

 

[Syed Mustafa.1.1]

Well..
the answer to third Question can be..
Why did the mughals have to face so many rebellions during their rule? /7

1. The mughal empire was a mighty empire, the emperors could not know what was happening in every part of empire.. whenever a rebellion broke out, it was months before the emperer could take any decessive action.
2. Different cultures,religions in the empire, every reform introduced were implemented in whole empire , it was likely that any group of people was dissatisfied by them, the empire always had pressure from saperate elements rebelling against the rule.
3. the mughal army's expertise declining.. and when it became obvious that mughal strength was declining, discontent groups within the empire were quick to launch rebellions in the different parts or empire.

Set me right if its wrong.. i hope its right...

 

[Syed Mustafa.1.1]

Q.3 MAIN MUGHALS KAY KIS PERIOD KAY BARAY MAIN BATANA HAI, AURANGZEB OR POST- AURANGZEB PERIOD!!!

Course me bus aurangzeb he.. or rebellions mainly isk period me start huwe.. pehle bhi the.. but kam the..

 

[Ahmed khan 98]

Q#3 MAY BE AS FOLLOWING:
1) some hindus considered him to be anti-hindu and a very strict and intolerant religious personality, so they arose in rebellion against the authorities at delhi, main rebellion was in deccan from the marathas.
2) due to some of aurangzebs policies , such as reimposing jizya tax on the hindus.
3) due to inadequate administration of aurangzeb, such as high taxation and a very high amount spent on the army and also alot of money wasted on the emperors personal luxurious living life.

what about this answer

 

[Syed Mustafa.1.1]

Q#3 MAY BE AS FOLLOWING:
1) some hindus considered him to be anti-hindu and a very strict and intolerant religious personality, so they arose in rebellion against the authorities at delhi, main rebellion was in deccan from the marathas.
2) due to some of aurangzebs policies , such as reimposing jizya tax on the hindus.
3) due to inadequate administration of aurangzeb, such as high taxation and a very high amount spent on the army and also alot of money wasted on the emperors personal luxurious living life.

what about this answer

Well your this answer completely answers my next Question..

Why was Aurangzeb unpopular by the time of his death in 1707? /7

 

[Syed Mustafa.1.1]

I think we can sum up the correct points of question 3 as....

Why did the mughals have to face so many rebellions during their rule? /7

1. 1) some hindus considered him to be anti-hindu (due to some of aurangzebs policies , such as reimposing jizya tax on the hindus) and a very strict and intolerant religious personality, so they arose in rebellion against the authorities at delhi, main rebellion was in deccan from the marathas.
   
2. inadequate administration of aurangzeb
3. The mughal empire was a mighty empire, the emperors could not know what was happening in every part of empire.. whenever a rebellion broke out, it was months before the emperer could take any decessive action
4. Different cultures,religions in the empire, every reform introduced were implemented in whole empire , it was likely that any group of people was dissatisfied by them, the empire always had pressure from saperate elements rebelling against the rule.
5. the mughal army's expertise declining.. and when it became obvious that mughal strength was declining, discontent groups within the empire were quick to launch rebellions in the different parts or empire.

 

[Ahmed khan 98]

I think we can sum up the correct points of question 3 as....

Why did the mughals have to face so many rebellions during their rule? /7

1. 1) some hindus considered him to be anti-hindu (due to some of aurangzebs policies , such as reimposing jizya tax on the hindus) and a very strict and intolerant religious personality, so they arose in rebellion against the authorities at delhi, main rebellion was in deccan from the marathas.
   
2. inadequate administration of aurangzeb
3. The mughal empire was a mighty empire, the emperors could not know what was happening in every part of empire.. whenever a rebellion broke out, it was months before the emperer could take any decessive action
4. Different cultures,religions in the empire, every reform introduced were implemented in whole empire , it was likely that any group of people was dissatisfied by them, the empire always had pressure from saperate elements rebelling against the rule.
5. the mughal army's expertise declining.. and when it became obvious that mughal strength was declining, discontent groups within the empire were quick to launch rebellions in the different parts or empire.

YEH HUI NA BAAT!!!!

 

[Syed Mustafa.1.1]

there are some more questions from the 1st chap of history..

4.Why was the size of mughal empire, reason for its downfall? /7
5.Why did foreign invaders attack india? /7
6.Why was Aurangzeb unpopular by the time of his death in 1707? /7

ENTER THE BRITISH NOW..

7. Why did the EIC got involved in the Sub-continent in 17th centuary? /7
8.Why did the British Gov take controll of the affairs of EIC in early 19th centuary? /7
9.Why was British so successful in expanding its control of the sub-continent between 1750 and 1850? /7
10.Why was the British rule hated from 1784 to 1852? /7
11.Why was the Battle of Plassey fought? /7
12.Why was the Battle of Plassey Important for the Bitish? /7
13.Why was Punjab annexed? /7
14.Why was Sindh annexed? /7

Any further questions from the 1st chapter then feel free to add them as 17,18 and so on..