- Messages
- 214
- Reaction score
- 478
- Points
- 73
N.P. Thank you very much for appreciating !Man I hv given my History Paper yesterday, and every question was provided in the guess by Sir Muhammad Rafay. This is Awesome. Thanks!
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
N.P. Thank you very much for appreciating !Man I hv given my History Paper yesterday, and every question was provided in the guess by Sir Muhammad Rafay. This is Awesome. Thanks!
that's great....plz help as well for paper 2 geography.N.P. Thank you very much for appreciating !
i know dear but there was no statement in the Q whether to be against it or with it!! and coclusion and analysis in this question can be mixed with anything like development of pak etc! my quetsion is that was it an openended question in which we can link the quetsion with pakistan movement or development of ML etc!! and can u tell me in which year this question was posted as ive seen all papers from 2000 to 2012 and as per the new standard all question realting to ssak always had a legible statement ! can u atleast tell the conclusion and isnt it a mistake of cambridge?Conclusion to this question can be written and it is up to you, the answer to this question was same as those SSAK question given in mark schemes. CIE just changes the wordings, you would see in the mark scheme of this paper that the answer given is the same as the one given to the same SSAK 14 marks question in prevoius years. So you could have written the conclusion either in favour or against, if you against then you have to give the reason which is his most important contibution and if in favour then in the conclusion you have to write in few words why it was important.
One thing is for sure that his question must have conclusion as it is a requirement of 14 marks question, but I cannot figure out whether there is a link with ML or pakistan movement. In this question you can have any of SSAK development as most important in the conclusion regardless whether it is given in the statement or not . Check out N 2010 Q2C.i k
i know dear but there was no statement in the Q whether to be against it or with it!! and coclusion and analysis in this question can be mixed with anything like development of pak etc! my quetsion is that was it an openended question in which we can link the quetsion with pakistan movement or development of ML etc!! and can u tell me in which year this question was posted as ive seen all papers from 2000 to 2012 and as per the new standard all question realting to ssak always had a legible statement ! can u atleast tell the conclusion and isnt it a mistake of cambridge?
he asked as WAS n thx simply tells us that yes or no n why ?Well thanks for the guess paper. In the paper did examiner made a mistake inquestion 2 c : the question was : Was the two nation theory the most important contribution of ssak ??It was a 14 mark question and in it we are supposed to write a conclusion at the end and analysis of every reason we explain and it can't be done as there wasn't written that was the contribution of ssak important to Pakistan movement , development of ML, improving coditions of mulsims in sbcontinent or anything what so ever. If conclusion can be made can you tell me.
Two Nation Refers To Ssak Political Reforms.....Conclusion to this question can be written and it is up to you, the answer to this question was same as those SSAK question given in mark schemes. CIE just changes the wordings, you would see in the mark scheme of this paper that the answer given is the same as the one given to the same SSAK 14 marks question in prevoius years. So you could have written the conclusion either in favour or against, if you against then you have to give the reason which is his most important contibution and if in favour then in the conclusion you have to write in few words why it was important.
Of course.......why do you ask?Is it still safe to skip section 3?
TO LESTEN THE RISK DO OME CHPS OF IT , I RECENTLY GAVE MY EXAMS N FOUND GOOD TO HAVE STUDIED SME CHPS OF SECTION3Is it still safe to skip section 3?
Of course.......why do you ask?
TO LESTEN THE RISK DO OME CHPS OF IT , I RECENTLY GAVE MY EXAMS N FOUND GOOD TO HAVE STUDIED SME CHPS OF SECTION3
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now