Pakistan Studies, Islamiyat and Urdu: Post your doubts here!

[Spidey21]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

1) what is the treaty of sevres ?
2) what was the communal award?

 

[SalmanPakRocks]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

C'mon so easy

I will give u a hint
Treaty of Serves was for partitioning Turkey !!
Communal Award passed by Ramsay Mchdolnalds in 1932

 

[scouserlfc]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

Arey ha itna assan nahin atta cmon Spidey u disappointed me

 

[Spidey21]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

dude mujhe idea tha lekin i wasnt able to collect enough facts...............thanx though!!! although complete facts would have been appreciated!!!

 

[SalmanPakRocks]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

Lets get on topic !! any queries ask !!

 

[Spidey21]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

salman tell me the answers please i cant figure these out!

 

[InshallahAajaega]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

Q. y did the indians accept the 3rd june plan ???

 

[Alchemist4lyf]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

Yawwrrr...

Q. How was Jinnah important to the Pakistan movement? [14]

 

[InshallahAajaega]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

1. 14 pts
2. symbolic leadrshp
3. uniting muslms
4. pressurizng british
5. day of deliverance
6. safeguardng rites of muslms
7. creatng awareness !!!
in points ko xplain kr do !!!
un k charcter k bare me bi thra likh do !!!
wat bout my question ???

 

[SalmanPakRocks]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

Q. y did the indians accept the 3rd june plan ???

A rare one indeed but here is my response
-The Muslims accepted the 3rd June plan as Lord mountbatten warned them that if they don't accept it there will be no pakistan.
-Hindus accepted it as the British rule was finally over.
-Indians also accepted this plan as they knew that it was in the favour of both the parties and Congress knew that the Partition was inevitable so it accepted the plan.

Hope this helps

 

[Translucent231]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

The hindus , nehru , had the view that pakistan was not feasible and it would soon combine again with india after pressure .. is this correct ?

 

[ashiqbal]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

yeah u cud add that as they tried to destroy pakistan in the beginning!

 

[ashiqbal]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

yar aik 14 marks question hai!

Q "The War of Independence 1857 achieved nothing". Give reasons why you might agree or dis agree woth the statement. (14)

so in the answer should we add these points:
FOR BRITISHERS:
Successess:
-got direct control of whole of india, established crown rule
-india became british colony and source of economic benfit

FOR LOCAL PEOPLE:

Faliures:
-lost control of all of india
-many rulers and people were killed in war
-after war british punished people, especially muslim sepoys , who were murdered brutally
-Muslims lost their position in india and british did not trust them for a long time

Successess:
-indians learnt not to fight physically, rather constitutionally. Later INC and AIML was formed
-became source of inspiration for patriotic alliances
-british started working for welfare eg roads, buildings, canals, sound education, judiciary, etc.
-they decided to hear the voice of loacal people and give them jobs in civil service.

YAR please tell k yeh jawab sahi hai ya nahin and please if u know any more points, please add. and were there any british failiures??

 

[Alchemist4lyf]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

British successes:
Queen Victoria proclaimed empress.
Rearranged army
Indian Panel code was enforced by them, to bring all of india on a uniform law.

Failures
Lost people.
Great Damage to finance
Great Damage to image.
Loss of power of EIC..

I think thats about it.

 

[ashiqbal]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

yar but it isnt told for whom it acheived something or nothing!

 

[Spidey21]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

i think you have to write about the successes and failiures of the locals!!!!!!!!!

 

[AnGeL.Of.DaRkNeSs]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

yeah i also dont knw in the conclusion we will make will it be based on successes or failiures of locals or successes or failiures of british officers???

failliures:
muslims were at the lowest ebb after the war .they isolated themselves from the main streamline.British blamed muslims largely for the cause of war of independence and pointed their wrath towards them.Many muslims were killed and their property were confescated.ALSO muslims objected to english as they thought it was unislamic this led to british withdrew their fundings from muslim schools and muslim education fell into decline.
British agreed to no intervention in religions of indians still after the war christian missionaries resumed the propagation of thieri religion with new vigour and assurance..
ALL of india fell into hands of british.many lives were lost and all indians failed to threw away british from subcontinent

SUCCESSES:
British attitude became reconciliatory.
Doctrine of lapse was abolished and british agreed to no further territorial acquistion.
For promotion of education new schools,colleges were opened.
British gave opportunities to indians to participate in ruling country(Civil services and seats in govt)This led to foramtion of political parties in india to give voice to demands of indian people so that rather than going for agitation indians could have a platform to express their demands to their rulers...
Also British agreed to abide by all treaties..
As a result of W.O.I british changed its agrarian policy in indo-pak.The permanent settlement of bengal was reconsidered and land owners were provided safeguards.
British began to recruit more indians in army and mostly from groups like pathas,,sikhs,,gurkhas who they thought were trustworthy.it is estimated that 140000 army soldiers were indians and 65000 were british...

SUCCESSES FOR BRITISH:
EIC transferred powers to British and powers of eic officers were restriced.
British gained direct control of india and became sole leaders.
ALL rebellians were surpressed thus all opposition by indians ended
india became british colony and source of economic benfit

 

[scouserlfc]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

one more point Mughal power finally finished although they never had power but there name was finally goneeee.

 

[Spidey21]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

but the war of independence was started by the locals and if anything was achieved it would be for them and if anything failed it would be for the ,,, the british dont matter here!!
thats what my teacher told me and i dont think i have time to communicate so write what you think and it will be God who will do whats better for us cuz His decision is better than anyones!!
my points for this question are
Successes
led to the development of two nation theory
British decided to bring reforms which gave indians power in the gov
and it was a beginning to the democratic era in India
Failiures
failed to achive its purpose that was to make British leave
the harsh treatment done to the Emporer of Mughals and the muslims
complete takeover by the british crown which you can also say that india became a british colony!

 

[InshallahAajaega]

Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

heres another one brothas :
how did quit india movement help in getting independence ??!!! 7 marks