Physics Paper 52 - Discussion

[Pals_1010]

How was it?

Discussion of answers after 24 hours

 

[babycry]

difficult

 

[Pals_1010]

difficult

Which part you found hard?

 

[Taci12]

Was great!

 

[Ashayn]

50/50

 

[Daniyal23]

It was very easy.

 

[good man12]

the easiest paper ever

 

[Sandhya Mahat]

very easy.. still made some mistakes in the data calculation of the table.. Would I get Ecf for all the datas and the graphs according to the table?

 

[alcoholic 111]

Mine went okay !!
Question 1 went pretty Good but Messed up in question 2
But the paper was a bit tough I guess
GT 19 -20

 

[Mukit-ul Islam]

was a pretty decent paper

 

[AlexRH]

1.29*10^-6 for my gradient! Value didnt workout!

 

[srijitsharma]

my question no 1 went bad, 2 went awesome..!
it seems everything has gone correct in question no 2 !!

 

[good man12]

well da paper was easy, i had a friend who got a C in his AS , and e seems to be getting full!!! too optimistic i guess, but it was good,,,,,,,,

 

[123dawg]

grade thresholds?

 

[xyz!]

questn 2 was gud... bt i guess i messed up wid Q1...dnt noe! waiting to discuss the ppr...

 

[EvilAngel Manoshi]

awsum to the power infinity

 

[Sandhya Mahat]

1.29*10^-6 for my gradient! Value didnt workout!

I got the same value.. But don't know if it's correct or wrong..

 

[Taci12]

1.29*10^-6 for my gradient! Value didnt workout!

I got 1.28 x (10^-6), it did work out for me!

 

[xyz!]

I got 1.28 x (10^-6), it did work out for me!

i got 1.30*10^-6
btw r v now allowed to discuss d ppr?

 

[good man12]

yes, u are all fine, the range for grad i bet is like 1.27-1.32 x 10^-6.........i guess if u got plank constant somewhere near 6.9 it was fine