Physics Paper 62 discussion

[Tekno-M]

24 hours have passed, haven't they?
So yes, please discuss your answers

 

[Tekno-M]

What did you guys write for the question that asked "Do the results support this suggestion (Yes/No, Explanation).

 

[samanas]

i wrote no because the resistances were too different i think.....wat u wrote?

 

[Tekno-M]

I wrote yes, because the difference was only 0.5, and the limit of experimental accuracy is 10%.

 

[Hadi Murtaza]

I wrote yes, because the difference was only 0.5, and the limit of experimental accuracy is 10%.

Me 2

 

[$Vettel$]

i wrote no , n showed the difference in the resistance

 

[mamoon123]

I wrote yes.
But I did a lot of cutting crossing as I read the ammeter reading wrong :/
I got to know of my mistake later on, and since I wrote in ballpoint pen, remover wouldn't work, I crossed the incorrect answers and wrote the correct ones above them, plus, I also wrote the correct answers in the working. Am I still going to lose marks? :/

 

[Tekno-M]

I wrote yes.
But I did a lot of cutting crossing as I read the ammeter reading wrong :/
I got to know of my mistake later on, and since I wrote in ballpoint pen, remover wouldn't work, I crossed the incorrect answers and wrote the correct ones above them, plus, I also wrote the correct answers in the working. Am I still going to lose marks? :/

If you underline it or write Ans. or something that indicates that this is the answer and not plain working, then they'll give the mark.

 

[mamoon123]

If you underline it or write Ans. or something that indicates that this is the answer and not plain working, then they'll give the mark.

I did my working to the far left side, so separating it from the answer column, I thought about underlining or writing "ans" with it but I panicked and just wrote it above the crossed out answer. I feel confident, however, as I used the correct value for working later on in the same question. I'm pretty sure they'll see through it.