- Messages
- 2,951
- Reaction score
- 17,783
- Points
- 523
Yeah it was... I think I may loose nearly 7-8 marksHeyy how was ur exam?? it was a bit hard isn't it?
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Yeah it was... I think I may loose nearly 7-8 marksHeyy how was ur exam?? it was a bit hard isn't it?
how did u draw the radioactive graph i didn take Ln wat abt u? and the internal energy que the statement was nt right bcz they was nt ideal gases as they hve P.E ryt? so internal energy doesnot decreaseYeah it was... I think I may loose nearly 7-8 marks
how did u draw the radioactive graph i didn take Ln wat abt u? and the internal energy que the statement was nt right bcz they was nt ideal gases as they hve P.E ryt? so internal energy doesnot decreaseYeah it was... I think I may loose nearly 7-8 marks
how did u draw the radioactive graph i didn take Ln wat abt u? and the internal energy que the statement was nt right bcz they was nt ideal gases as they hve P.E ryt? so internal energy doesnot decrease
I put both the graphshow did u draw the radioactive graph i didn take Ln wat abt u? and the internal energy que the statement was nt right bcz they was nt ideal gases as they hve P.E ryt? so internal energy doesnot decrease
how did u plot both? and tht 1st que abt tht microwave detector i wrote tht the galaxy i moving away frm us and the frequence is shifted smethng like tht so tht universe is expanding without limit i don kno even y i wrote ths bt i thnk i cancelled it i 4got is tht ok or no? and 1 que they askd define resshift and how 2 measure distance i ssaid tht red shift measures the speed and use of change in wavelength by original= speed by speed of light i fel its wrng ans isn't it? wat u thnk?I put both the graphs
well, it was partly true... Internal energy does decrease but the gas may liquefy before 0K
i was abt 2 write abt v=hd bt i didn anyway i don wnt 2 waste ur time u got an exam 2mrow so inshalla we'll talk later wish u al the best and i really fel inshalla 2mrow its goin 2 be easyDont ask how I did that >.<" I ran out of time n did sum crap >.<"
Its correct what u wrote! And even if u scratched it BUT did not write nething more, it will be considered so dw
yes thats correct too, only u need to add that we use v = Hd after dat
U'll prob loose just 1 mark for that not more Dwi was abt 2 write abt v=hd bt i didn anyway i don wnt 2 waste ur time u got an exam 2mrow so inshalla we'll talk later wish u al the best and i really fel inshalla 2mrow its goin 2 be easy
sure i'll pray ok jst 1 more que im soo sry jst wnted 2 confirm the ans 4 teh displacement was smethng 0.091? and the time 4 radioactive was 84s?U'll prob loose just 1 mark for that not more Dw
yeah i do >.<" Inshallah, DO pray for me please
Happy Holidays to you
what displacement? :Ssure i'll pray ok jst 1 more que im soo sry jst wnted 2 confirm the ans 4 teh displacement was smethng 0.091? and the time 4 radioactive was 84s?
the oscillation quewhat displacement? :S
yeah i think it was 84 or 85
Yes it wasthe oscillation que
i solved it absolutely wrng and no time time was running ok the luminosity graph they askd how to measure its luminosty i said funny ans i said the peak wavelength shows its temp and frm temp we can find lumi. frm the y-axis and the stars lumo.is a multiple of the suns lum. and then i wrote smethng extra bt wrng tht negative correlation gves the brightnessYes it was
did u solve the KE question? I couldnt even do the show that for the mas deficit... My power wasnt comming right
Same herei solved it absolutely wrng and no time time was running ok the luminosity graph they askd how to measure its luminosty i said funny ans i said the peak wavelength shows its temp and frm temp we can find lumi. frm the y-axis and the stars lumo.is a multiple of the suns lum. and then i wrote smethng extra bt wrng tht negative correlation gves the brightness
wat 2 do my mind was totally blocked frm tension anyway so sryy and i'll close nw so tht u can study hope evrythng wil be okSame here
Well, ur right till the luminosity part, after that u just had to use L = (sigma)AT^4
I can't understand how I dint get that simple show that questionwat 2 do my mind was totally blocked frm tension anyway so sryy and i'll close nw so tht u can study hope evrythng wil be ok
which 1 the number of molecules?I can't understand how I dint get that simple show that question
Inshallah
n sure no problem
No the mass deficit question, first part!which 1 the number of molecules?
i got 7.5 cuz thay said around 8 u jst had 2 subtract jstNo the mass deficit question, first part!
Which question? The one for which we had to get 20MeV. I got 20 x 10^8i got 7.5 cuz thay said around 8 u jst had 2 subtract jst
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now