• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Which is more developed Pakistan or Nepal?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Points
18
Nibz, don't bother. He's a anti-muslim troll.
Go see the last few posts in "How to get A* in A Levels" thread.
 
Messages
4,493
Reaction score
15,418
Points
523
Well i think its abt time that the troll gets trolled... apart from everything else thats gonna happen to him :p ;D
 
Messages
316
Reaction score
490
Points
103
First, come with clean hands yourself before talking about the dirty stuff that we supposedly did.

You talk about killings, atrocities and destruction, what was your Govt. thinking when it sent the trained Mukti Bahni to East Pakistan where they killed thousand of innocent muslims and led to its separation? That was certainly a greater tragedy than the Mumbai attacks. If that was not terrorism then I don't know what is.
And now your RAW is doing the same in Balochistan.

If you are so kind and sweet and pure, where does your sympathy go when you kill the innocent in Srinagar, Kashmir? Terrorism is terrorism whether it is by Ajmal Qasab in Mumbai or Indian forces under organised manner in Kashmir. But you only call your loss terrorism. Why the double standards?

Terrorism is a totally global phenomenon. If 166 Indians died in Mumbai, we are very sad about that. But more than 3000 Pakistanis have also died due to terrorism. Sad but true.

And to say that your economy was destablized because of the killings of Mumbai is just a stupid statement.
More people die in India due to hunger and disease than due to one attack that killed 130 people. Feed them first before mourning over their death!

It's not that we Pakistanis abhor Indians. We condemn all their killings. But you can't just say that the whole Pakistan state is a terrorist organization.
It is high time that we, THE YOUTH, stand against such killings, and stop being blinded by the hatred bred into us by the corrupt politicians.

Topic: Pakistan is a more developed country than Nepal.
well said bro!:cool:
 
Messages
584
Reaction score
555
Points
103
First, come with clean hands yourself before talking about the dirty stuff that we supposedly did.

You talk about killings, atrocities and destruction, what was your Govt. thinking when it sent the trained Mukti Bahni to East Pakistan where they killed thousand of innocent muslims that led to its separation? That was certainly a greater tragedy than the Mumbai attacks. If that was not terrorism then I don't know what is.
And now your RAW is doing the same in Balochistan.

If you are so kind and sweet and pure, where does your sympathy go when you kill the innocent in Srinagar, Kashmir? Terrorism is terrorism whether it is by Ajmal Qasab in Mumbai or Indian forces under organised manner in Kashmir. But you only call your loss terrorism. Why the double standards?

Terrorism is a totally global phenomenon. If 166 Indians died in Mumbai, we are very sad about that. But more than 3000 Pakistanis have also died due to terrorism. Sad but true.

And to say that your economy was destablized because of the killings of Mumbai is just plain stupid.
More people die in India due to hunger and disease than due to one attack that killed 130 people. Feed them first before mourning over their death!

It's not that we Pakistanis abhor Indians. We condemn all the killings and attacks. But you can't just say that the whole Pakistan state is a terrorist organization.
It is high time that we, THE YOUTH, stand against such killings, and stop being blinded by the hatred bred into us by the corrupt politicians.

Topic: Pakistan is a more developed country than Nepal.
In 1971, the main target of the Pak army was the Bengali civilians. They killed 2.5 million innocent Muslim Bengalees, burnt villages, looted our property and raped our women. It was one of the worst genocide in world history. Muktibahini fought for the independence of Bangladesh. The Mukti bahini itself comprised of 90% Muslims. They attacked and defeated the Pak army who comitted murder and rape and were sent by Yahya to destroy the Bengali nation. At that time, India gave us shelter and trained us. Without their help more people would have been killed by the Pak army. Pak should be ashamed of what they did in 71. And Nibz bhai, don't try to worsen the relationship between the two Muslim states by posting false statements. Mukti Bahini is our national pride. Say whatever you want against India, but if you post lies about Bengali independence I have to interfere.
 
Messages
379
Reaction score
680
Points
103
In 1971, the main target of the Pak army was the Bengali civilians. They killed 2.5 million innocent Muslim Bengalees, burnt villages, looted our property and raped our women. It was one of the worst genocide in world history. Muktibahini fought for the independence of Bangladesh. The Mukti bahini itself comprised of 90% Muslims. They attacked and defeated the Pak army who comitted murder and rape and were sent by Yahya to destroy the Bengali nation. At that time, India gave us shelter and trained us. Without their help more people would have been killed by the Pak army. Pak should be ashamed of what they did in 71. And Nibz bhai, don't try to worsen the relationship between the two Muslim states by posting false statements. Mukti Bahini is our national pride. Say whatever you want against India, but if you post lies about Bengali independence I have to interfere.
the two nations signed a pact stating that no nation would create cases against individuals for the fall of Dhaka, but still Bangladesh's primeminister SHW sentenced dozens of people to death. why?
 
Messages
584
Reaction score
555
Points
103
the two nations signed a pact stating that no nation would create cases against individuals for the fall of Dhaka, but still Bangladesh's primeminister SHW sentenced dozens of people to death. why?
Those dozens of people who are being sentenced each killed more than 300-400 people and raped women. They worked with the Pak army to kill Bengalees. Just imagine what would happen if a group of 10 foreign armed people and Razakars comes to your house, kills your father and brother and rapes your sister in front of you? What punishment would you want? Obviously, you would have wanted a death sentence.
 
Messages
379
Reaction score
680
Points
103
Those dozens of people who are being sentenced each killed more than 300-400 people and raped women. They worked with the Pak army to kill Bengalees. Just imagine what would happen if a group of 10 foreign armed people and Razakars comes to your house, kills your father and brother and rapes your sister in front of you? What punishment would you want? Obviously, you would have wanted a death sentence.
i disagree with you, but it would start a conflict if i just provide some facts, so just leave it. Bangladesh should respect the pact, those 10 foreign men were Indian troops in pak army's uniform, those razakaars were defending their beloved nation, Bangladesh didn't existed then!
still it is sad that Bangladesh was separated, politicians on both sides could've found a way in negotiations!
 
Messages
584
Reaction score
555
Points
103
i disagree with you, but it would start a conflict if i just provide some facts, so just leave it. Bangladesh should respect the pact, those 10 foreign men were Indian troops in pak army's uniform, those razakaars were defending their beloved nation, Bangladesh didn't existed then!
still it is sad that Bangladesh was separated, politicians on both sides could've found a way in negotiations!
After the indepence of Pakistan in 47, the Pakistani flag flew proudly in the streets of Dhaka and Chittagong, the Bengalees celebrated along with their Punjabi and Pathan countrymen. But as days passed the West Pakistan led government started to treat the Eastern wing as a colony. Even though Bangla was the mother tongue of majority of Pakistanis, Urdu was established as the state language and bangla (which is the language spoken by 16 crore Muslims) was described as a Hindu language. When Bengalees protested against it in 1952, thousands were killed, especially on 21st February. The discrimination continued when the West Pakistani government announced its budget. 85% of the total budget was kept for West Pakistan and a mere 15% for East Pakistan. When a massive cyclone broke out in East Pakistan, the West Pakistan government took absolutely no steps to help the Bengalees. All the food and resources sent by foreign nations, were kept in Karachi and used by West Pakistanis while the East Pakistanis died due to famine. The money and property of East Pakistan were transfered to West Pakistan. The Bengalees were not given a chance in top government posts and only 5% of the Pak army consisted of Bengalees. At times the top leaders of the West Pakistani government made racial comments against the Bengalees by describing them as physically unfit for military training. There were very few armed men in East Pakistan, leaving the Eastern wing exposed and vulnerable to attacks by India. From 1950 to 1970 there was not a single day when the Bengalees were not tortured or killed. Yet the Bengalees did not want Pakistan separation. Instead, they tried to solve the problem by electing Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in 1969 elections. Only when the Yahya led government refused to handover the power to Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib, Bengalees started thinking about the independence of Bangladesh. Such discriminations and the operation Searchlight on 25 March resulted in an armed conflict which eventually led to the separation of Pakistan.
 
Messages
379
Reaction score
680
Points
103
like i said there politicians on both side should agree on some conditions,mujib ur rehman should have formed government and resolved all problems!
 
Messages
584
Reaction score
555
Points
103
like i said there politicians on both side should agree on some conditions,mujib ur rehman should have formed government and resolved all problems!
Sheikh Mujib won the 1969 election but Yahaya refused to give him power. If Yahaya gave the power to Bangabandhu then maybe the separation of Pakistan would not have happened. Instead of transfering power, Yahaya sent troops to East Pakistan to kill 3 million innocent Bengalees. West Pakistan is responsible for Pakistan separation, not India. India interfered only after the Pak army attacked Bengalees on 25 March
 
Messages
379
Reaction score
680
Points
103
Sheikh Mujib won the 1969 election but Yahaya refused to give him power. If Yahaya gave the power to Bangabandhu then maybe the separation of Pakistan would not have happened. Instead of transfering power, Yahaya sent troops to East Pakistan to kill 3 million innocent Bengalees. West Pakistan is responsible for Pakistan separation, not India. India interfered only after the Pak army attacked Bengalees on 25 March
yahya is no hero in pak
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top