• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

who did the bio p6b edexcel 0n 14 may.tues.?

Messages
645
Reaction score
2,266
Points
253
hi guys..am one of those unfortunate ppl who did the bio 6pr 6b...well it didnt go very well for me..wat about u guys..got sme questions,,plz answer them for me..
1.wat was the null hypothesis,was there or was there not a correlation b/w the no. of earthworms nd the the effect of ploughing?
2.wa the null hypothesis to be rejected or accepted?
3.wat medians did u get?
:confused:plz reply me..am really tensed...
 
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Points
1
1. the null hypothesis is there is no significant difference between the no. of earthworms and type of ploughing methods.
2. accept the null hypothesis.
3. 8 for field A and 7 for field B i think.
 
Messages
645
Reaction score
2,266
Points
253
1. the null hypothesis is there is no significant difference between the no. of earthworms and type of ploughing methods.
2. accept the null hypothesis.
3. 8 for field A and 7 for field B i think.
if this is so..then i messed everything up!!!:cry:
 
Top