• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Economics P12 june 2012 ANSWERS...!!!

Messages
77
Reaction score
19
Points
18
a decrease in innovation means that a country will have lesser new, more efficient capital for the future... if the same level of innovation had been sustained the level of production would not have decreased leaving the PPF intact.. but since the question said "decrease in innovation" the country will have less of more efficient capital in the long run thus causing the PPF to shift inwards... i asked my teacher abt this question and he said the answer was A... and he is an examiner.. so yea..
One thing I don't understand about your response is that.. technology that's already there will not magically disappear.. so if they still have the same technology then they can continue producing at the same level of output ?
 
Messages
229
Reaction score
41
Points
38
consumer surplus.. cuz producers vie to maximize their profits.. so in course of that they won't mind taking up all of consumers' surpluses... and other answers seemed unlikely... ur talking abt the same question, aren't you?
Yea, which means firms take into account of it when making investment decisions. If consumer surplus is zero for example, maybe firms will decide not to invest after cba
 
Messages
11
Reaction score
4
Points
13
i meant the government would consider it bt not the firms... firms will only be bothered about the cost that has incurred to them and the revenue they might earn by selling the product... firms don't give a shit abt consumers' surplus.. but the government will be concerned about consumers' welfare so they take consumers' surplus into account...
 
Messages
229
Reaction score
41
Points
38
i meant the government would consider it bt not the firms... firms will only be bothered about the cost that has incurred to them and the revenue they might earn by selling the product... firms don't give a shit abt consumers' surplus.. but the government will be concerned about consumers' welfare so they take consumers' surplus into account...
But they do. They see if there is a consumer surplus for firms to exploit
 
Messages
11
Reaction score
4
Points
13
what's you answer to that question? i thought the other options were unlikely... i don't remember the question though... i just remember marking that particular option cuz the other options seemed unlikely...
 
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
483
Points
93
With regard to the cost benefit analysis questions, all options mentioned involved private costs except for 'consumer surplus'. Tax payments are obviously considered by a private firm since they are private costs. The govt. does not consider it because it doesn't need to pay tax!
 
Messages
229
Reaction score
41
Points
38
The question never said its about cost benefit analysis it Asks what the govt considers but firms don't when deciding whether to invest in something. Tax payments can be how the govt considers how much tax revenue it receives etc.
 
Messages
737
Reaction score
127
Points
53
The question never said its about cost benefit analysis it Asks what the govt considers but firms don't when deciding whether to invest in something. Tax payments can be how the govt considers how much tax revenue it receives etc.
Yea thats what thought..
 
Messages
281
Reaction score
160
Points
53
Only cash? Can credit cards used to pay goods and services?
Not everywhere, there are still many shops which do not accept them. Plus what if you have reached the limit on your credit card? So it can't be termed as money if we make an assumption that money should ALWAYS be acceptable to pay for goods and services.
 
Messages
737
Reaction score
127
Points
53
Not everywhere, there are still many shops which do not accept them. Plus what if you have reached the limit on your credit card? So it can't be termed as money if we make an assumption that money should ALWAYS be acceptable to pay for goods and services.
exactly..and furthermore people don't usually use credit cards to pay a plumber or a carpenter or a gardener..:)
 
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
483
Points
93
The question never said its about cost benefit analysis it Asks what the govt considers but firms don't when deciding whether to invest in something. Tax payments can be how the govt considers how much tax revenue it receives etc.
I don't remember the question but if that's the case, you're probably right. =)
 
Messages
737
Reaction score
127
Points
53
For the PPC question i chose A as the answer. Arguments stated by people who chose A and those who chose C are both good. The answer could be A if one considers whats going to happen in the long run. For example if innovation decreases to zero and you have a machine, after a period of say 10 years the machine is going to become redundant. Considering that fact that there is no technological advancement, the production possibilities are bound to decrease. Rise in the price of energy means that the COP is going to rise but that does not mean that production possibilities are going to decrease. True oil importing firms may reduce output but the production possibilities will remain the same. So this is what i think. Obviously this is open to discussion.
 
Top