Physics P1 All MCQ [After 24H]

Messages
390
Reaction score
893
Points
103
ppl em worried! viewing above discussion , makes me feel that gt might go high ! due to sme intelligent fellows !
 
Messages
313
Reaction score
165
Points
53
im expecting a gt of 27-29 maximum.

And
Last thing:
In very lay-man terms... will the gt be greater than 32?

I think you're right about the current one! the current would be the same at all times, regardless when we take it, whereas everything else would have had effect on the value!
 
Messages
175
Reaction score
91
Points
38
im expecting a gt of 27-29 maximum.

And


I think you're right about the current one! the current would be the same at all times, regardless when we take it, whereas everything else would have had effect on the value!

IA.
Cozz... *head down* I've got 8 confirmed wrong...
Errm can u elaborate? I'm right abt my answer being wrong or right abt the answer being systematic error?
 
Messages
55
Reaction score
15
Points
18
The parrallel cables had 14ohms resistance. The movement of the charged particle in electric field was downwards hence answer was A
 
Messages
150
Reaction score
21
Points
28
im expecting a gt of 27-29 maximum.

And


I think you're right about the current one! the current would be the same at all times, regardless when we take it, whereas everything else would have had effect on the value!

CURRENT wont be same for all times its always fluctuate.
 
Messages
55
Reaction score
15
Points
18
For the ammetre reading question, it was asked which statement could NOT explain the reading. The answer had to related to systematic error beacause this could not explain the scatter of the readings. In systematic error all values come fairly constant but at a distance from the actual value. All other statments were related to random error. I hope i am right.
 
Messages
2,703
Reaction score
3,939
Points
273
For the ammetre reading question, it was asked which statement could NOT explain the reading. The answer had to related to systematic error beacause this could not explain the scatter of the readings. In systematic error all values come fairly constant but at a distance from the actual value. All other statments were related to random error. I hope i am right.
you seem right :p
 
Top