• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Mathematics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
455
Reaction score
7,676
Points
503
Can u guys upload the questions again? Only the ones you need. Ill see if i can help. :)
 
Messages
14
Reaction score
8
Points
13

For Vector question, I used this approach but got weird values of b and c. Must be a silly mistake. I am just writing the steps as the actual answer is way too long!

  • First, write down the vector for normal of plane p and q
  • Use Dot product { np.nq = |np| x |nq| x cos 60 }
  • Obtain equation containing variables b and c
  • Next, { d = a.nq } and 'a' can be Pnt A or B from Part (i)
  • Obtain a second equation { I got d = 3+b-c }
  • Solve both eq. simultaneously to find b or c
  • If you get a Quadratic equation, take the positive answer as b or c
  • Find d and subs. the values into plane q eq.
  • Problem Solved (I think)

I hope this method is right. Otherwise, please point out my mistake.
BTW, was this variant 3?
 
Messages
7
Reaction score
3
Points
13
Hey guys.
Can someone please help me with this question
upload_2016-4-10_23-2-7.png

I got the answer for the first part
upload_2016-4-10_23-3-24.png

But the problem is i don't get why did they not calculate mg sinθ as resistive force in the second part although they used it in the first part of the question. The engine would also do work against this component of weight so why dont we use it in our calculation.
upload_2016-4-10_23-8-39.png
please help....
 
Messages
14
Reaction score
8
Points
13

OK! Here's the solution to Complex no. question (#7).

Part (i) is easy while in Part (ii), you should remember that the given eq. can be proven if you work the other way round (from answer to question). But both ways are OK.

P.S. Our Teacher discussed this question with us in school and we proved Part (ii) in like, 40 min!
 

Attachments

  • ComplxScan.jpg
    2.3 MB · Views: 6
Messages
478
Reaction score
143
Points
53
OK! Here's the solution to Complex no. question (#7).

Part (i) is easy while in Part (ii), you should remember that the given eq. can be proven if you work the other way round (from answer to question). But both ways are OK.

P.S. Our Teacher discussed this question with us in school and we proved Part (ii) in like, 40 min!
In part (i) why is |z| = sqrt(a^2 + b^2)^2? Shouldnt it be sqrt(a+bi)^2?.
Firstly why are there 2 times square when removing modulus? Secondly u missed the iota as z is a complex number
 
Messages
478
Reaction score
143
Points
53
OK! Here's the solution to Complex no. question (#7).

Part (i) is easy while in Part (ii), you should remember that the given eq. can be proven if you work the other way round (from answer to question). But both ways are OK.

P.S. Our Teacher discussed this question with us in school and we proved Part (ii) in like, 40 min!

In second part i dont get it from 3rd step onwards. After squaring on both sides why is (z-2i)^2 equal to (z-2i)(z-2i)*. I dont get the conjuguate part (*)
 
Messages
14
Reaction score
8
Points
13
In part (i) why is |z| = sqrt(a^2 + b^2)^2? Shouldnt it be sqrt(a+bi)^2?.
Firstly why are there 2 times square when removing modulus? Secondly u missed the iota as z is a complex number

Whoa, man! To find mod of a complex no., you use this formula:

If z = a+bi
then |z| = sqrt(a^2+b^2)

because if you plot z on an Argand diagram, you can find the length of the line (from origin to z) using Pythagoras theorem as it makes a triangle. And that length is mod of z. You getting it?

And what's iota? The 'i'? Well, i just differentiates between the real and unreal part of the complex no. so that is why it isn't written during calculations (e.g. when finding arg z, you don't write i in the formula)

Hope you understand it because this my first time explaining something on xtremepapers!
 
Messages
478
Reaction score
143
Points
53
Whoa, man! To find mod of a complex no., you use this formula:

If z = a+bi
then |z| = sqrt(a^2+b^2)

because if you plot z on an Argand diagram, you can find the length of the line (from origin to z) using Pythagoras theorem as it makes a triangle. And that length is mod of z. You getting it?

And what's iota? The 'i'? Well, i just differentiates between the real and unreal part of the complex no. so that is why it isn't written during calculations (e.g. when finding arg z, you don't write i in the formula)

Hope you understand it because this my first time explaining something on xtremepapers!
thanks buddy. What abt part ii question i asked
 
Messages
14
Reaction score
8
Points
13
In second part i dont get it from 3rd step onwards. After squaring on both sides why is (z-2i)^2 equal to (z-2i)(z-2i)*. I dont get the conjuguate part (*)

DON'T read the first part where I crossed it. The answer starts from |z-2i| = 4

Well, I used the relationship given in part (i). As they made us prove it, there must be some use of it, right? But I did it this way (as I proved in reverse) :

because |z|^2 = zz* {Part (i) question}
then |z-2i|^2 = (z-2i)(z-2i)* {z is a complex no. so z-2i must also be a complex no. because add/subt of a complx no. = another complx no.}
 
Top