- Messages
- 341
- Reaction score
- 224
- Points
- 53
i think the people who chose ACL3 thought that due negative power, the numbers were decreasing but they were actually increasing.
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
ik plz pray for thatA ON 20
A ON 20
A ON 20
PLEASE
wait in the tablei think the people who chose ACL3 thought that due negative power, the numbers were decreasing but they were actually increasing.
Same now i just hope its rightThe reason I choose KCL was that it required the least amount of moles as compare to others, like the concentrations were given so you could calculate the amount required and because it was talking about cation as well.
Fe203 was postively charged and so the whole question talked about the negative ion of Sulphate and how Sulphate caused precipiation so by that relatonship Arsenic was negatively charged so over here we needed to talk about the positively charged ionbut that was for iron which was positively charged aint it?
yeswait in the table
the numbers were increasing downwards right?
well from the trendSame now i just hope its right
yhFe203 was postively charged and so the whole question talked about the negative ion of Sulphate and how Sulphate caused precipiation so by that relatonship Arsenic was negatively charged so over here we needed to talk about the positively charged ion
ohhhhhhhh yh now i get it lolbut acc to table ALCL3 req the greatest mass
The table of concentrations that caused ppt were based on that effectiveness of charge and the least amount of moles required was for KCL3 which was around 1.02x10^-3 others increased downwardsyh
but AlCl3 was more positive so wasnt it post to be more effective?
no wait wut?but acc to table ALCL3 req the greatest mass
Still on the "A" borderlineohhhhhhhh yh now i get it lol
shiz m defo getting a 23 now
was the trend of no. of moles increasing as charge increased?The table of concentrations that caused ppt were based on that effectiveness of charge and the least amount of moles required was for KCL3 which was around 1.02x10^-3 others increased downwards
yeswas the trend of no. of moles increasing as charge increased?
yeah it was increasing the power of 10 was constant but the values were increasingwas the trend of no. of moles increasing as charge increased?
so AlCl3 ACCORDING TO THE TABLE FOR IRON SOL had more moles than KClyeah it was increasing the power of 10 was constant but the values were increasing
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now