• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Recent content by MahirLatif

  1. MahirLatif

    A MUST READ!

    I would say that this does not qualify as a 'must' read. Interesting nonetheless. or maybe not. Ignore me this is just exam stress talking. or maybe not.
  2. MahirLatif

    My current status is (None)... OH MY GOD I MUST POST SOMETHING !

    My current status is (None)... OH MY GOD I MUST POST SOMETHING !
  3. MahirLatif

    Chemistry 42....how did it go?..expected GT

    InshAllah ... but I do know I messed up... Taste the freedom and enjoy the coming holidays.
  4. MahirLatif

    Chemistry 42....how did it go?..expected GT

    Phys ka p5 rehta hai :P... and maths wasn't much of a problem for me anyways.. but DAMN CHEM !! :O I got BBA is the first three papers in AS.. now expecting an CA or DA in the next two papers this year
  5. MahirLatif

    Chemistry 42....how did it go?..expected GT

    omg did ANYONE sleep before this paper ? I was awake for like 30 hours straight before I sat for the paper. Same for my friends. and judging the posts here a lot of other people too.. Chemistry does give you sleepless nights eh ? well whats done is done and jaan chutti A level chemistry se ...
  6. MahirLatif

    statistics p62

    No that will never happen. It will be around 36 or so
  7. MahirLatif

    Statistics Paper 62

    Distribution questions are straightforward in the sense that their method is the same. So practice se they can be done. This time the distribution question WAS a little tricky and more probability questions mean more people getting less marks. I am expecting 45+ but what I judged from how OTHER...
  8. MahirLatif

    how was chem. p5

    Hurrah for us ? :/
  9. MahirLatif

    how was chem. p5

    That was the part after they asked u calculate the gradient. I was talking about the very last part of the last question. Where they asked significance of your previous answer, not gradient
  10. MahirLatif

    how was chem. p5

    did u read the question ? they were asking about the graph that was GIVEN .. not the one we drew. and that was a curve and hence completely unsuitable
  11. MahirLatif

    how was chem. p5

    Well I can be perfectly wrong too, but I diverted the mixture of gases to a flask placed in an ice bath (beaker/bucket full of ice) which was at 0 degrees. The vapours condensed there and I collected the water in the flask. the other Gas just passed on to the syringe i attached to the flask...
  12. MahirLatif

    how was chem. p5

    No i did not. but i dont think it was necessary, as the gas syringe was already at room temp. and how were you supposed to control the temperature of the gas in the syringe anyway ? can't place it in a water bath can you.. ?
  13. MahirLatif

    how was chem. p5

    Pressure on X axis. 1/Volume on Y axis
  14. MahirLatif

    how was chem. p5

    The Last graph was a straight line which went on to curve at higher pressure. The answers to the very last three questions. Why graph unsuitable to confirm Boyle's Law ? because gradient is not constant. Why take initial slope ? because the graph curves at higher pressures and gradient again...
  15. MahirLatif

    how was chem. p5

    those who mentioned a leibig condenser are wrong. The very first part of the question mentions apparatus EASILY available in a school lab. Plus a condenser can't be attached simply anywhere, and it uses water, not ice. The Gradient was 2.7 x 10^-4 for the second question. ( although i wrote 3 x...
See more
Top