• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Search results

  1. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    Okay so kg or g.. would still give you a negative gradient.
  2. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    hahahaha you know what I did? I took of my jacket and wrapped the sleeve around the water level, took the circumference and then measured the diameter XD (I know I wasn't meant to do that but I couldn't help myself when I knew I could get a more accurate d like that than with a ruler)
  3. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    no its valid cause the cup's opening's surface area was not the same as the surface area of the water and they asked you to measure the diameter of the surface area of the water. Was your cup uniformly cylindrical? Cause it wasnt meant to be.
  4. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    you know what? I have my values .. Im going to make a table where the mass is kg and where the mass is grams.... this really might make the difference (scared now)
  5. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    And how is that possible.. if they didn't measure the first height accurately.. the most inaccurate it can get is by the first height being less than the rest of the heights ... then you'd get a series of negative values for your h.-h/m column..... nobody did that. < that is not what a negative...
  6. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    and thats thing with all of you people who got positive gradients, you dont remember what happened in the paper!
  7. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    no ... can you do that?!
  8. angelicsuccubus

    Mathematics: Post your doubts here!

    june o8 is so not as hard as our paper... the only thing annoying about jun 08 was the second part in complex numbers and the pn/tns second part.. everything else was straightforward and solve-able... our paper... how the hell do you even integrate lnx squared or solve the differential equation...
  9. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    lets think about it this way... if metres/grams is plotted against 1/grams... do they have a positive relationship? Take any values you want.. Edit: Remember that our values were in 0.00s and the difference between h.-h increased
  10. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    no! i got a negative gradient.. no way in hell could I get a positive gradient.. I donno wtf they did to their values?!
  11. angelicsuccubus

    Math 32....how was it? :/

    I know right?! mechanics was rooted so much in your pure math being good rather than mechanics concepts.. i mean q6 and 7 were like WHAT?! If m2 is the same.. I'm gonna.. i donno what >.<!
  12. angelicsuccubus

    Physics (p4) messed up *HELP*

    that can't be right... p4 is a lot of percent but everything else will make up for it.. rose1700 Don't worry about it and focus on getting like 100%s in the other phys papers, kay? You can do this!
  13. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    that doesnt change anything.. if they took decreasing masses then their (h.-h)/m values would have increased ... anyway how can they take decreasing masses? start from 350 and go to 150? The fricking inverse proportionality does not change!
  14. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    okay I need you to answer every question Im about to type: 1) Which string did you hang the masses on? Short one or long one? 2)What was your h. (the fixed one) ? 3)Were your values for (h.-h)/m increasing as (1/m) decreased or were they both increasing or decreasing? 4)Did you plot (1/m) on...
  15. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    yeh mine either.. my y intercept was 0.0006 and my gradient was -0.15
  16. angelicsuccubus

    Chemistry: Post your doubts here!

    what reaction are you guys talking about?
  17. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    lol we had ACs blasting in the room so my temp for the cup decreased by 5 degrees and for the bowl decreased by 7 degrees
  18. angelicsuccubus

    Mathematics: Post your doubts here!

    which paper has had the lowest gt so far? lets check that paper and compare the level of difficulty?
  19. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    and that would make no sense.. any idiot would have noticed if the mass was on the wrong string because they wouldnt have been able to adjust h by moving just one clamp.
  20. angelicsuccubus

    How was physics paper 33

    I dont think that was it.. cause the kids in my school all attached it to the right (the correct one) but they all had a positive graph and i had a negative graph..
Top