• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Search results

  1. nabeelah

    nothingngngng

    p33 but i guess ive messed a bit with salt analysis
  2. nabeelah

    nothingngngng

    EASY :)
  3. nabeelah

    HOW WAS M1 MATHS PAPER???

    so got total dist and average speed wrong(-2 marks perhaps)
  4. nabeelah

    HOW WAS M1 MATHS PAPER???

    i've integrate with c=dist covered from 0 to 45s so got the answer directly but i don't knw why on earth(stressed maybe) i've add this dist with that calculated during 0 to 5 and 5 to 45s!! :(
  5. nabeelah

    HOW WAS M1 MATHS PAPER???

    if i'm not mistaken its 9t-0.1(t^2) -200
  6. nabeelah

    HOW WAS M1 MATHS PAPER???

    and for total dist i've done 8.33+100+117 which gives 225(not sure if its good) 7(iv) i've done T(min/max)+R(min/max)-1000=100x(0.08 or 0.1)
  7. nabeelah

    HOW WAS M1 MATHS PAPER???

    did u use graph paper?/
  8. nabeelah

    HOW WAS M1 MATHS PAPER???

    ohh sry its 7(iv) :P
  9. nabeelah

    did i miss something!O_o

    did i miss something!O_o
    • nabeelah
    • Profile post comment
  10. nabeelah

    HOW WAS M1 MATHS PAPER???

    i've 225 as total distance!!and 7(ii) is not the same as yours but the others are more or less the same!
View older results
Top