- Messages
- 1,124
- Reaction score
- 9,570
- Points
- 523
I got (CH3)3CH2COOH ._.i got F as (CH3)3CCOOH
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
I got (CH3)3CH2COOH ._.i got F as (CH3)3CCOOH
Ikr DNA stuff is good you can score easily therei really hated how they did NOT put stress to electrochem and polymerization and DNA stuff.
i feel too many questions on hydrolysis of amides and way too many new questions compared to previous papers.
i really hope the A* treshold is below 190/260 or else im screwed
whoops yeah thats what i meant.I got (CH3)3CH2COOH ._.
Thank Godwhoops yeah thats what i meant.
its a skeletal diagram .the H's dont matter
yeah i just memorized all that replication and structure n shit.Ikr DNA stuff is good you can score easily there
the br-benzene-cooh group i thinkThank God
Hey and for one of the organic chem questions, what was the ppt and why was it insoluble? :/
I only left two marks blank, the solvent used for NMR, and why the ppt is insolube. the rest I may have done wrong but I didnt leave it blank xDdid any of u find a time shortage and leave some questions blank?
Tell me about the stupid NaN3 question, what were the equations for its decompostion?did any of u find a time shortage and leave some questions blank?
I got (CH3)3CH2COOH ._.
Is that structure even possible?whoops yeah thats what i meant.
its a skeletal diagram .the H's dont matter
image isnt opening.2NaN3 --> 3N2+2Na
the only way i got to know was becoz questio told it will decompose to its elements
igot the n3- ion question wrong.
according to wikipedia
The suggest questions! There were too many suggest questionsi
in what?
Thats what. (CH3)3CCOOH
(Y)What did u guys write for the ppt one in the second last question?..... my structure was 4 bromobenzoic acid (which we had to draw in the box) and reason for insolubilty was because it has two electron withdrawing groups on opposite sides
Rates of reactions probablity is there as well xDi also wonder why they did not put electrochem..Maybe its in paper 5,bear that in mind.......!!!!
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now