- Messages
- 216
- Reaction score
- 334
- Points
- 73
D cus it looks like the only true statement...as by lowering direct taxes...people would have more money to spend hence increasing Aggregate demand which leads to Demand Pull Inflation
🚀 NEW from the xtremepape.rs team: AI exam prep — 120,000+ worked solutions, and it marks your handwritten working from a photo. Sign in with your forum account & try it free → prepare.xtremepape.rs
D cus it looks like the only true statement...as by lowering direct taxes...people would have more money to spend hence increasing Aggregate demand which leads to Demand Pull Inflation
it's asking the domestic PRODUCTION meaning it has got to do with the supply...so at P1 supply was hitting at point W and when tarrif is removed and new price is now P2 supply now only reaches till V so the change is WV
Why it cant be A?D cus it looks like the only true statement...as by lowering direct taxes...people would have more money to spend hence increasing Aggregate demand which leads to Demand Pull Inflation
I guess A because a positive statement can be incorrect also.
Obvio the number of firms broPlease explain.View attachment 48835
$20 - $17 = $3
International trade obviously as a fall in unemployment will not produce something which is outside the PPC.View attachment 48838
In the MS answer is B can someone please explain. and also why the answer cant be C?
I think it's B.
Thanks a lot$20 - $17 = $3
Yes but can you please explain how? B!(+)(+)dy $k(_)!!I think it's B.
Is it right?
But this answer is wrong even i thought the same but the answer is BObvio the number of firms bro
But why not C?I guess A because a positive statement can be incorrect also.
🚀 NEW from the xtremepape.rs team: AI exam prep — 120,000+ worked solutions, and it marks your handwritten working from a photo. Sign in with your forum account & try it free → prepare.xtremepape.rs