- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Okay, so I am having massive problems in the topic 'accounting ratios'. The paper is on Monday and I don't get if someone is playing a huge prank on me .
Basically, everywhere I see net profit ratio is Net profit MINUS interest over sales. In every question I have seen so far that is NOT the case.
HOWEVER, in the same question, for instance November 2006 Q2 in return on total capital employed they HAVE added back interest to the net profit figure. Previously, in two parts, namely, net profit ratio and return on owners capital employed that is not the case.
Then in November 2002 Q2 again they have NOT added back interest to the net profit in the net profit ratio but something has made them add it back in the return on total assets and return on net assets.
That's not where it all ends though, as in June 2003 Q2 for some reason they have added back interest to the Net profit figure FOR NET PROFIT RATIO EVEN THOUGH IN THE PREVIOUS TWO CASES THEY HADN'T.
Sorry for the long read but I REALLY REALLY need to find what the problem is. Is there something very obvious I am missing or what?
Basically, everywhere I see net profit ratio is Net profit MINUS interest over sales. In every question I have seen so far that is NOT the case.
HOWEVER, in the same question, for instance November 2006 Q2 in return on total capital employed they HAVE added back interest to the net profit figure. Previously, in two parts, namely, net profit ratio and return on owners capital employed that is not the case.
Then in November 2002 Q2 again they have NOT added back interest to the net profit in the net profit ratio but something has made them add it back in the return on total assets and return on net assets.
That's not where it all ends though, as in June 2003 Q2 for some reason they have added back interest to the Net profit figure FOR NET PROFIT RATIO EVEN THOUGH IN THE PREVIOUS TWO CASES THEY HADN'T.
Sorry for the long read but I REALLY REALLY need to find what the problem is. Is there something very obvious I am missing or what?