• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Biology; Chemistry; Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
3,412
Reaction score
9,812
Points
523
haha i wrote carbon oxygen double bonds. cuz there wer c=o bonds. no c=c bonds i culd see

yes, exactly. Thats why i wrote nothing related to atoms.
I didn't specify.
I thought their would be one mark for DOUBLE BONDS.. and one mark for MANY or IN A NUMBER OF PLACES, as that is what POLY means.

But now people are saying their was a mark for saying Double bonds BETWEEN CARBON ATOMS :(
 
Messages
3,412
Reaction score
9,812
Points
523
Messages
12
Reaction score
19
Points
13
yes in part one if temp incrses forward reaction incrss
in second part if pressure incrss , backward reaction incrss
No! the first one you did right but in the second one if the pressure increases the rate of forward will increase
cause there were 7 moles on the reactant side and 4 on the product so equilibrium is shifted to product side!
 
Messages
1,243
Reaction score
1,891
Points
173
When i did this paper at home, i wrote C-C double bonds.
But in the paper we had, their was a fat shown, and they said it was polyunsaturated. And it had Double bonds between C and O, like C=O.
No C=C.

That made me think it might not always be between C=C.
I absolutely agree..Look I am not saying urs is wrong..not by a long shot..I am just saying its wht they wrote in MS tht,s all...Like I said they do amend the questions and perhaps at higher levels unsaturation may refer to other double bonds but in Olevels they just want us to get the gist or like tht and hence they will,in this case, consider other perfectly accurate ans as well
 
Messages
1,243
Reaction score
1,891
Points
173
No! the first one you did right but in the second one if the pressure increases the rate of forward will increase
cause there were 7 moles on the reactant side and 4 on the product so equilibrium is shifted to product side!
Dude,hate to break it to u,the quation read
3Fe +4H20(g)=Fe203 and 4H2(g)
since pressure affects only gaseous reaction the 4 moles of each gas steam and water r present and hence any pressure chng will not shift the equilibrium
 
Messages
3,412
Reaction score
9,812
Points
523
I absolutely agree..Look I am not saying urs is wrong..not by a long shot..I am just saying its wht they wrote in MS tht,s all...Like I said they do amend the questions and perhaps at higher levels unsaturation may refer to other double bonds but in Olevels they just want us to get the gist or like tht and hence they will,in this case, consider other perfectly accurate ans as well

That's just unfair. They gave a diagram of an unsaturated fat, that clearly showed it was not necessarily between carbon carbon atoms.
Even Carboxylic acids are unsaturated, and can decolourize bromine. They have a double bond. And something that has a lot of Double bonds, is polyunsaturated.
I don't understand their mark allocation of having one mark for saying ''Carbon carbon'' :/
So i lose a mark for not ''memorizing'' the marking scheme.
 
Messages
657
Reaction score
1,447
Points
143
I assume u want me to state tht it can be any one or tht I am not sure which one...The pt I am trying to say is tht despite the refraction(which is one time only)it will meet at tht point and we can easily adjust the line accordingly
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/refrn/Lesson-5/Image-Formation-Revisited
U might want to rephrase tht.. I think i cant convey it properly enough ..Hook up the conv lens img formation.U will get wht I mean
I know that -_-
You aren't getting what I am telling you. I am not saying it's not possible. I am saying you need refractive index and angle of incidence to correctly draw the path of a ray.
 
Messages
1,243
Reaction score
1,891
Points
173
I know that -_-
You aren't getting what I am telling you. I am not saying it's not possible. I am saying you need refractive index and angle of incidence to correctly draw the path of a ray.
Yar ...we get the first point of contact by passing ray undeviated thru the cdntre...We now get out first point..NOW all the rays frm tht point will converge at tht point which they illustrated in tht site....So it does not matter whether we know abt refr index or not...I don't want or like to repeat but it does not matter here abt refr index and u r saying tht a parallel line from tht point is the only corr answer...No it is not and not on ur pretext tht it passes thru the focal point....Let me be clarified as well do u also mean to tell me tht the points where the rays meet is the focal length of the lens?(from the lens to pts they converge)just as a check..
Well, the rest I have simply been restating to u before
 
Messages
657
Reaction score
1,447
Points
143
Yar ...we get the first point of contact by passing ray undeviated thru the cdntre...We now get out first point..NOW all the rays frm tht point will converge at tht point which they illustrated in tht site....So it does not matter whether we know abt refr index or not...I don't want or like to repeat but it does not matter here abt refr index and u r saying tht a parallel line from tht point is the only corr answer...No it is not and not on ur pretext tht it passes thru the focal point....Let me be clarified as well do u also mean to tell me tht the points where the rays meet is the focal length of the lens?(from the lens to pts they converge)just as a check..
Well, the rest I have simply been restating to u before
When did I say only parallel line is correct answer? Any CORRECT ray is an answer provided that it is correct.
Yeah focal point.
 
Messages
1,243
Reaction score
1,891
Points
173
When did I say only parallel line is correct answer? Any CORRECT ray is an answer provided that it is correct.
Yeah focal point.
so thts the fountainhead of ur misconception yar points do not always converge at focal point..Infact they rarely converge at f infact in practicals they converge very close coz theoretically tht,s not completely possible..It,s not the focal point...check the site does the image form at focal pt?
 
Messages
757
Reaction score
1,018
Points
153
so thts the fountainhead of ur misconception yar points do not always converge at focal point..Infact they rarely converge at f infact in practicals they converge very close coz theoretically tht,s not completely possible..It,s not the focal point...check the site does the image form at focal pt?
u ppl still fighting on physics. forget it. relax. whats next ppr u ppl hv?
 
Messages
657
Reaction score
1,447
Points
143
so thts the fountainhead of ur misconception yar points do not always converge at focal point..Infact they rarely converge at f infact in practicals they converge very close coz theoretically tht,s not completely possible..It,s not the focal point...check the site does the image form at focal pt?
The question said that it was at focal length where the image formed. My diagram was relating to that. I know it wont be at focal point unless stated But all rays do pass through focal point except the ones passing through the center. Here your site showing how to draw ray diagrams. the original drawing was not drawn like the way shown.
 
Messages
657
Reaction score
1,447
Points
143
u ppl still fighting on physics. forget it. relax. whats next ppr u ppl hv?
NO
yeti.gif
 
Top