• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

CHEMISTRY 53. How was it??

Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Points
1
i thought it was supposed to be related for the qs 1 and total worth of 5 marks. but from markscheme, ecf is possible right..
 
Messages
21
Reaction score
4
Points
3
did you say that when volume decreases pressure also decreases?? and the graph was just a straight line graph?
 
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Points
3
Hmm, but if you think about it, they ask what is the effect of pressure when "Volume of (gas)" decreases [Not container]. So, the answer should be when volume of gas decreases in a 'fixed container', the pressure should decrease too because there's less molecules colliding the container walls. The P/V graph should be proportional.
 
Messages
21
Reaction score
4
Points
3
Hmm, but if you think about it, they ask what is the effect of pressure when "Volume of (gas)" decreases [Not container]. So, the answer should be when volume of gas decreases in a 'fixed container', the pressure should decrease too because there's less molecules colliding the container walls. The P/V graph should be proportional.

that's what i thought as well! wonder what others have put..
 
Messages
17
Reaction score
6
Points
13
Hmm, but if you think about it, they ask what is the effect of pressure when "Volume of (gas)" decreases [Not container]. So, the answer should be when volume of gas decreases in a 'fixed container', the pressure should decrease too because there's less molecules colliding the container walls. The P/V graph should be proportional.
But to decrease the volume of gas shouldn't we decrease the volume of the container? I think you've confused it with decreasing the amount of gas in the container.. To say there's less molecules colliding with the container walls is wrong, because they mentioned that the mass of the gas is fixed. So technically, there are the same amount of molecules. But I could be wrong, I wasn't so sure of my answer myself :/
 
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Points
3
But to decrease the volume of gas shouldn't we decrease the volume of the container? I think you've confused it with decreasing the amount of gas in the container.. To say there's less molecules colliding with the container walls is wrong, because they mentioned that the mass of the gas is fixed. So technically, there are the same amount of molecules. But I could be wrong, I wasn't so sure of my answer myself :/

Decreasing the volume of gas "Without" decreasing the volume of container is possible (Eg. Turning the container partially vacuum)
I'm quite sure they said that the container is at fixed volume during compression and the number of gas molecules are to be varied.
 
Messages
84
Reaction score
12
Points
8
Decreasing the volume of gas "Without" decreasing the volume of container is possible (Eg. Turning the container partially vacuum)
I'm quite sure they said that the container is at fixed volume during compression and the number of gas molecules are to be varied.
Question said fixed mass of gas. Mass wouldnt be constant anymore if the number of gas molecules is to be varied. Mass of gas = number of molecules x mass of each molecule
 
Top