• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Chemistry paper-21

Messages
213
Reaction score
135
Points
53
Asked people what they thought of the exam, most thought it was good to easy. I suppose the curve would be high, around 47-49/60 for A
 
Messages
7
Reaction score
8
Points
13
I think it was really easy, as did most around me... I'm not an expert so far as predicting GTs, but I would expect it to be really high compared to the last few years.
 
Messages
749
Reaction score
1,541
Points
153
It was wayyyyyy too easy, felt like an o lev paper,,,,,but now the other papers will come hard since it was impossibly very easy, it had NO equilibrium questions !,
 
Messages
869
Reaction score
374
Points
73
i dont wanna know if what i will say is discussing a paper or not. if it is please tell me and i will delete my post because i am not willing to discuss but i just have a general question.

if we use hot acidified MnO4 on a double bond which had RCH=CRH it will oxidise to carboxylic acids? if i only oxidized it to aldehyde do i lose marks for that or both are accepted ?
 
Messages
2,848
Reaction score
4,427
Points
273
i dont wanna know if what i will say is discussing a paper or not. if it is please tell me and i will delete my post because i am not willing to discuss but i just have a general question.

if we use hot acidified MnO4 on a double bond which had RCH=CRH it will oxidise to carboxylic acids? if i only oxidized it to aldehyde do i lose marks for that or both are accepted ?
in the book it says it first gets oxidised to aldehyde and then Carboxylic acid so i dont think they will deduct marks
 
Messages
1,321
Reaction score
2,743
Points
273
It was of 11 marks altogether, question 1. I hope its not paper discussion.. no intention of that
 
Top