• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Chemistry: Post your doubts here!

Messages
844
Reaction score
2,495
Points
253
salam
can anyone please explain q1(c) partts (i) and (ii) from May June 2012 paper 42

http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Chemistry (9701)/9701_s12_qp_42.pdf

ci) The enthalpy change of solution represents the change of state of an ionic compound from solid to aqueous form. This change corresponds to the difference in energy values for ΔHf MgCl2(s) and ΔHf mgCl2 (aq) as it represents the exact same state change.
So, ΔHsol = -801 - (-641) = -160 KJ/mol

ii) Use the answer form (i) for the formula in (ii). The hydration enthalpy of Cl- should be multiplied by 2 as one mole MgCl2 gives 2 mols of Cl- ions.
ΔHsol (MgCl2) = {2*ΔHhyd(Cl-) + ΔHhyd(Mg2+)} - ΔHlatt(MgCl2)
-160 = 2* ΔHhyd(Cl-) + (-1890) - (-2526)
Therefore, ΔHhyd(Cl-) = (-160 + 1890 - 2526)/2 = -398 Kj/mol
 
Messages
681
Reaction score
1,731
Points
153
Assalamu Alikum Wa Rahmatullah Wa Barakatoho..... Amy Bloom scouserlfc
Can someone explain this question.

A current of 0.500 A is passed through the electroplating cell. Calculate the time required to deposit a mas of 0.500 g of copper on to the ornament.
 
Messages
844
Reaction score
2,495
Points
253
Assalamu Alikum Wa Rahmatullah Wa Barakatoho..... Amy Bloom scouserlfc
Can someone explain this question.

A current of 0.500 A is passed through the electroplating cell. Calculate the time required to deposit a mas of 0.500 g of copper on to the ornament.

.5 g copper = .5/63.5 = 7.87 *10^-3 mol
Cu^2+ +2e- = Cu
To deposit one mole of copper you need 2 mols of electron, so to deposit 7.87*10^-3 mols of Cu you need = (7.87*10^-3)*2 = 0.0157 mols of electron.
The charge on one mole of electron is 1 Farad i.e. 96500 Coulomb. So the charge on .0157 mols of electron is = 0.0157* 96500 =1519.7 C
So, you need 1519.7 C to deposit .5 g of copper.
Now use the formula Q= It to find the time
1518.7 = .5 * t
t= 3039 sec = 50.7 mins.
 
Messages
681
Reaction score
1,731
Points
153
.5 g copper = .5/63.5 = 7.87 *10^-3 mol
Cu^2+ +2e- = Cu
To deposit one mole of copper you need 2 mols of electron, so to deposit 7.87*10^-3 mols of Cu you need = (7.87*10^-3)*2 = 0.0157 mols of electron.
The charge on one mole of electron is 1 Farad i.e. 96500 Coulomb. So the charge on .0157 mols of electron is = 0.0157* 96500 =1519.7 C
So, you need 1519.7 C to deposit .5 g of copper.
Now use the formula Q= It to find the time
1518.7 = .5 * t
t= 3039 sec = 50.7 mins.
Ma Shaa Allah!! Jazaki Allah khairan...! Thank you so much! May Allah provide with the highest grades in this life and hereafter...!! Thank you for explaining each step!
 
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
2,428
Points
273
Could anyone please explain the trends in hydration energies of Group II sulfates, plus the changes in ΔH(sol)? Like what is more soluble, more exothermic or less exothermic? :confused:
 
Messages
681
Reaction score
1,731
Points
153
Could anyone please explain the trends in hydration energies of Group II sulfates, plus the changes in ΔH(sol)? Like what is more soluble, more exothermic or less exothermic? :confused:
Asslamu Alikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatoho..

I was about to ask the same question....please, Can anyone too explain the lattice energy and how it affect solubility !
 
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
2,428
Points
273
Asslamu Alikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatoho..

I was about to ask the same question....please, Can anyone too explain the lattice energy and how it affect solubility !
w.a.salam

Down the group lattice energy decreases as the size of the cation increases, so the solubilty decreases.
 
Messages
681
Reaction score
1,731
Points
153
w.a.salam

Down the group lattice energy decreases as the size of the cation increases, so the solubilty decreases.
Jazaki Allah khairan!! Thank you so much! it is a confusing chapter...! May Allah provide you with highest grades in this life and hereafter, Ameen!!
 
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
2,428
Points
273
Jazaki Allah khairan!! Thank you so much! it is a confusing chapter...! May Allah provide you with highest grades in this life and hereafter, Ameen!!
Wa eyyaki. Indeed it is, which is why I just don't get it :/
Aaameeenn and JazakAllah :)
 
Messages
844
Reaction score
2,495
Points
253
Could anyone please explain the trends in hydration energies of Group II sulfates, plus the changes in ΔH(sol)? Like what is more soluble, more exothermic or less exothermic? :confused:

ΔH(sol) = ΔH(hyd) - ΔH(latt)

Sulphate ion is a relatively large anion compared to the sizes of the group 2 cations, so sulphate ion effects the lattice enthalpy more than the cation. As the size of the cation increases down the group the lattice enthalpy decreases down the group (becomes less exothermic), but sulphate is large enough to even be slightly polarised by barium and elements below it, so the decrease in lattice enthalpy is relatively small down the group.

For the hydration of the ion, the enthalpy of hydration remains constant for the sulphate ion but as the cation size increases the hydration enthalpy decreases (becomes less exothermic), this decrease is relatively large as the cation size increases quite drastically, and is independent of the anion size.

So, For example if the initial ΔH(hyd) and ΔH(latt) were -20 and -15 respectively ΔH(sol) = -20 - (-15) = -5
there is a greater decrease for ΔH(hyd) than for ΔH(latt), so the new values for ΔH(hyd) and ΔH(latt) would be -10 and -12 respectively. so ΔH(sol) = -10 -(-12) = +2
These are just random values to show the trend, you can see that ΔH(sol) gradually becomes more endothermic, so the salts becomes less soluble.
 
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
2,428
Points
273
ΔH(sol) = ΔH(latt) - ΔH(hyd)

Sulphate ion is a relatively large anion compared to the sizes of the group 2 cations, so sulphate ion effects the lattice enthalpy more than the cation. As the size of the cation increases down the group the lattice enthalpy decreases down the group (becomes less exothermic), but sulphate is large enough to even be slightly polarised by barium and elements below it, so the decrease in lattice enthalpy is relatively small down the group.

For the hydration of the ion, the enthalpy of hydration remains constant for the sulphate ion but as the cation size increases the hydration enthalpy decreases (becomes less exothermic), this decrease is relatively large as the cation size increases quite drastically, and is independent of the anion size.

So, For example if the initial ΔH(latt) and ΔH(hyd) were -20 and -15 respectively ΔH(sol) = -20 - (-15) = -5
there is a greater decrease for ΔH(hyd) than for ΔH(latt), so the new values for ΔH(latt) and ΔH(hyd) would be -25 and -30 respectively. so ΔH(sol) = -25 -(-30) = +10
These are just random values to show the trend, you can see that ΔH(sol) gradually becomes more endothermic, so the salts becomes less soluble.
Thankyou so much!!
One more thing, ΔH(sol) increases down the group?
 
Messages
681
Reaction score
1,731
Points
153
ΔH(sol) = ΔH(latt) - ΔH(hyd)

Sulphate ion is a relatively large anion compared to the sizes of the group 2 cations, so sulphate ion effects the lattice enthalpy more than the cation. As the size of the cation increases down the group the lattice enthalpy decreases down the group (becomes less exothermic), but sulphate is large enough to even be slightly polarised by barium and elements below it, so the decrease in lattice enthalpy is relatively small down the group.

For the hydration of the ion, the enthalpy of hydration remains constant for the sulphate ion but as the cation size increases the hydration enthalpy decreases (becomes less exothermic), this decrease is relatively large as the cation size increases quite drastically, and is independent of the anion size.

So, For example if the initial ΔH(latt) and ΔH(hyd) were -20 and -15 respectively ΔH(sol) = -20 - (-15) = -5
there is a greater decrease for ΔH(hyd) than for ΔH(latt), so the new values for ΔH(latt) and ΔH(hyd) would be -25 and -30 respectively. so ΔH(sol) = -25 -(-30) = +10
These are just random values to show the trend, you can see that ΔH(sol) gradually becomes more endothermic, so the salts becomes less soluble.
Jazak Allah khiaran....thank you soo much !!!!!!!!!!! Really wonderful explanation ! May Allah reward you and your family with Jannah tul firdous in hereafter. Ameen
 
Messages
355
Reaction score
95
Points
38
ΔH(sol) = ΔH(latt) - ΔH(hyd)

Sulphate ion is a relatively large anion compared to the sizes of the group 2 cations, so sulphate ion effects the lattice enthalpy more than the cation. As the size of the cation increases down the group the lattice enthalpy decreases down the group (becomes less exothermic), but sulphate is large enough to even be slightly polarised by barium and elements below it, so the decrease in lattice enthalpy is relatively small down the group.

For the hydration of the ion, the enthalpy of hydration remains constant for the sulphate ion but as the cation size increases the hydration enthalpy decreases (becomes less exothermic), this decrease is relatively large as the cation size increases quite drastically, and is independent of the anion size.

So, For example if the initial ΔH(latt) and ΔH(hyd) were -20 and -15 respectively ΔH(sol) = -20 - (-15) = -5
there is a greater decrease for ΔH(hyd) than for ΔH(latt), so the new values for ΔH(latt) and ΔH(hyd) would be -25 and -30 respectively. so ΔH(sol) = -25 -(-30) = +10
These are just random values to show the trend, you can see that ΔH(sol) gradually becomes more endothermic, so the salts becomes less soluble.
i think that ΔH(sol) =ΔH(hyd) _ ΔH(latt) and not the opposit

how to explain the solubility of the group 2 hydroxide
t
 
Top