• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Chemistry Practical 34 GT

What do you expect the GT to be?

  • <20

    Votes: 2 3.3%
  • 20-30

    Votes: 35 57.4%
  • 30-35

    Votes: 17 27.9%
  • 35+

    Votes: 7 11.5%

  • Total voters
    61
Messages
220
Reaction score
330
Points
73
For Question2 my mass loss was 0.05 g !! I dont remember exactly.. Initially the mass was 2.01g .. So what i did was i subtracted this 2.01-0.05 to get the remaining mass which was like 1.96g.. And then i found the percentage by (1.96/2.01)*100 .. I guess i didn't read the question properly...

Improvements were: Question 2 was less accurate , to get more accurate results heat crucible for longer time period until you get a constant mass. Lid the crucible for greater degree of mass loss.. What were your answers????

I GUESS I MESSED UP WITH THIS ONE!!
I too wrote the same Problem and improvement and i also suggested that heating should be done till constant mass. And the method to calculate % is fine, as far as i remember, i did it same way i guess, though not sure this question was troubling.
 
Messages
35
Reaction score
68
Points
28
I too wrote the same Problem and improvement and i also suggested that heating should be done till constant mass. And the method to calculate % is fine, as far as i remember, i did it same way i guess, though not sure this question was troubling.

Bro but from this case we get the percentage around 96% whereas everyone is getting there percentage around 5%... Did we had to use mass loss instead of remaining mass...
 
Messages
220
Reaction score
330
Points
73
Bro but from this case we get the percentage around 96% whereas everyone is getting there percentage around 5%... Did we had to use mass loss instead of remaining mass...
Well it's not bro, its sis :p
Anyways, my % was somewhere around 4% i guess, but i don't remember how i calculated it but as far as i can recall, what i did at that moment was correct and most people get around 5%. The question2 was a tough one to handle.
 
Messages
35
Reaction score
68
Points
28
Well it's not bro, its sis :p
Anyways, my % was somewhere around 4% i guess, but i don't remember how i calculated it but as far as i can recall, what i did at that moment was correct and most people get around 5%. The question2 was a tough one to handle.
Oki Sis:) ; Then I guess you divided the mass loss with the overall mass to get the percentage.. Somewhat like this (0.05/2)*100 .. Whereas what i did was (2-0.05/2)*100 :( .. so i got the inverse percentage of you all.. like 100 - 4 = 96% :cry::giggle:
 
Messages
220
Reaction score
330
Points
73
Oki Sis:) ; Then I guess you divided the mass loss with the overall mass to get the percentage.. Somewhat like this (0.05/2)*100 .. Whereas what i did was (2-0.05/2)*100 :( .. so i got the inverse percentage of you all.. like 100 - 4 = 96% :cry::giggle:
Oh, i guess i did this way then as my answer was 4% and don't worry, it was just 1 mark, you still have 39 to go :)
 
Messages
35
Reaction score
68
Points
28
Well i want to ask one thing??? i made a whole lot of a mess in Ques1 ---> i redid the question twice so i actually had to cut/erase (by pen) all my data and redo it again.. Many of my answers were not on the given dotted line... Is that an issue??
 
Messages
220
Reaction score
330
Points
73
Well i want to ask one thing??? i made a whole lot of a mess in Ques1 ---> i redid the question twice so i actually had to cut/erase (by pen) all my data and redo it again.. Many of my answers were not on the given dotted line... Is that an issue??
I did the same in question 2. I don't think it matters as long as the answer is visible.
 
Messages
35
Reaction score
68
Points
28
Guys how many marks are you guys getting on average in Chem Paper 1 --- I get around 30... So Damn Scared!!
 
Top