We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
No you include all numbers..
No, it was s^-1
it IS per second!
I am 100% sure it was s^-1 ask your teacher when you go to school next
It will not be s^-1. It would be s^-1*10^3..... This question came in 2003... check there.
units cannot be operated with numbers. they are only manipulated with units. and there was only one unit in the expression. i.e second in the denominator. so unit of rate s^-1
Units are sometime dealt with constant. For example I can write 1m as (1*1000mm)
you don't consider 'outliers' in chem. it's not exactly a statistics paper. and besides, it was just a one mark question. which means you don't have to be a stats genius to answer it. your calculator had to do all the work!
here you have changed the units entirely, but still you have not multiplied anything with the 'unit' itself. you've done it with the numerical magnitude that the unit is representing. and anyways this was not the case in the paper.
it turned blue litmus paper red.
Yousuf has a point there...the units should be s^-1*1000....because usually the rate is 1/time so you get s^-1*1 (which is the same as s^-1) but in this case it was 1000/time...can't believe i didn't think of that!! >.<
wasnt it an ester?
Cation test
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now