• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Economics, Accounting & Business: Post your doubts here!

Anusuya

Anusuya

Messages
153
Reaction score
40
Points
38
2pac said:
can we discuss p4? If so does anyone remember their section A answers?
Click to expand...
I never do well in the data response part. the answers are full of uncertainity.
well the first one was the support and contradiction of the market economy rite??
I wrote the price competitiveness n stuffs supporting it\
and govt intervention opposing it.
 
2

2pac

Messages
156
Reaction score
11
Points
18
Anusuya said:
I never do well in the data response part. the answers are full of uncertainity.
well the first one was the support and contradiction of the market economy rite??
I wrote the price competitiveness n stuffs supporting it\
and govt intervention opposing it.
Click to expand...
I don't know why people felt that Section A was easy.Like you,I wasn't really confident with any of my answers.Its a relief to know that the second part of the first question is correct.What did u write for the last part?I wrote that the govt switched from the smes to int businesses because of the advantages of increased tax revenue and output.I rememeber quoting a lot from the article,hope its correct.
 
Anusuya

Anusuya

Messages
153
Reaction score
40
Points
38
2pac said:
I don't know why people felt that Section A was easy.Like you,I wasn't really confident with any of my answers.Its a relief to know that the second part of the first question is correct.What did u write for the last part?I wrote that the govt switched from the smes to int businesses because of the advantages of increased tax revenue and output.I rememeber quoting a lot from the article,hope its correct.
Click to expand...
the last part inclluded the priority of govt on SME's rite?? idk why bt i felt the last and the 2nd last question a bit related.
anways i first described the govt. spendings on SME's all those contributions to GDP's and exxports of the countries were by SME's. at first govt tried boosting it...later realising the FDI's n its benefits. SME's were neglected and the changes in policies might be a threat to the SME's. first it prioritised Sme later changed policies.
I am not even 20% sure abt my ans.
 
redapple20

redapple20

Messages
764
Reaction score
752
Points
103
Yo guys i juzz cant make myself study!;( this is creepy ... i dun hav control ova myself!
 
WaleedUQ

WaleedUQ

Messages
399
Reaction score
170
Points
43
2pac said:
I don't know why people felt that Section A was easy.Like you,I wasn't really confident with any of my answers.Its a relief to know that the second part of the first question is correct.What did u write for the last part?I wrote that the govt switched from the smes to int businesses because of the advantages of increased tax revenue and output.I rememeber quoting a lot from the article,hope its correct.
Click to expand...
In the last part we had to tell why the malaysian goverment was interested in SME's
the first reason was of labour force, more than 50% was employed, that means 50% of consumption was coming from MSE
secondly it was contributing around 43.5 of malaysia total GDP, it was a source of an income for the goverment.
the reason for malaysia to be a dynamic economic in asia is due to SME's
Third contribution of 20% of Export is enough, it is helping malaysia trade balances to remain positive and have a stable exchange rate.
Manufacturing sector is the important sector for any developed economy, SME's were contributing the most in manufacturing as compared to all other sectors,
which means the goverment have to protect them as they were simply the spine of the economy
 
W

wajiman

Messages
240
Reaction score
124
Points
53
WaleedUQ said:
In the last part we had to tell why the malaysian goverment was interested in SME's
the first reason was of labour force, more than 50% was employed, that means 50% of consumption was coming from MSE
secondly it was contributing around 43.5 of malaysia total GDP, it was a source of an income for the goverment.
the reason for malaysia to be a dynamic economic in asia is due to SME's
Third contribution of 20% of Export is enough, it is helping malaysia trade balances to remain positive and have a stable exchange rate.
Manufacturing sector is the important sector for any developed economy, SME's were contributing the most in manufacturing as compared to all other sectors,
which means the goverment have to protect them as they were simply the spine of the economy
Click to expand...

exactly dats wat i wrote
 
2

2pac

Messages
156
Reaction score
11
Points
18
Anusuya said:
the last part inclluded the priority of govt on SME's rite?? idk why bt i felt the last and the 2nd last question a bit related.
anways i first described the govt. spendings on SME's all those contributions to GDP's and exxports of the countries were by SME's. at first govt tried boosting it...later realising the FDI's n its benefits. SME's were neglected and the changes in policies might be a threat to the SME's. first it prioritised Sme later changed policies.
I am not even 20% sure abt my ans.
Click to expand...
oh well lets hope we get full marks.
 
2

2pac

Messages
156
Reaction score
11
Points
18
WaleedUQ said:
In the last part we had to tell why the malaysian goverment was interested in SME's
the first reason was of labour force, more than 50% was employed, that means 50% of consumption was coming from MSE
secondly it was contributing around 43.5 of malaysia total GDP, it was a source of an income for the goverment.
the reason for malaysia to be a dynamic economic in asia is due to SME's
Third contribution of 20% of Export is enough, it is helping malaysia trade balances to remain positive and have a stable exchange rate.
Manufacturing sector is the important sector for any developed economy, SME's were contributing the most in manufacturing as compared to all other sectors,
which means the goverment have to protect them as they were simply the spine of the economy
Click to expand...
More or less I wrote something of that kind.I didn't explain it much though,just quoted the information and maybe hopefully I'll get half the marks.
 
W

wajiman

Messages
240
Reaction score
124
Points
53
WaleedUQ said:
D hai ans kiya ?
agar D hai tou dekho bhai
6000/0.9
he's asking for material usage kitna hwa ! ignore the inventories
consider normal loss that
6667 were used - 10% of material used = 6000 of OUTPUT produced from the process
Click to expand...

answer is D according to mark scheme
 
Saad Ghori

Saad Ghori

Messages
281
Reaction score
160
Points
53
WaleedUQ said:
D hai ans kiya ?
agar D hai tou dekho bhai
6000/0.9
he's asking for material usage kitna hwa ! ignore the inventories
consider normal loss that
6667 were used - 10% of material used = 6000 of OUTPUT produced from the process
Click to expand...
Got it! :)
 
WaleedUQ

WaleedUQ

Messages
399
Reaction score
170
Points
43
attempted nov09 economics
got 10 out of 30 !
Like A Boss
**** i need to study everything
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top