- Messages
- 1,666
- Reaction score
- 255
- Points
- 93
I just have a question related to the way the examiners cut our marks in Urdu exam papers.
Suppose there are two students, A and B. Student A had performed not that much perfect as that of B, but still student A's writing was very nice and attractive. Student A didn't make more cuttings than student B. Some of the difficult words which he can't translate into Urdu or English, he still managed by writing it with something. For example in case of elements, the student A wrote 'ejzaa' although in English ejzaa is components.
Student B's way of translation and letter writing was even better than that of A's. But he did make very much cuttings and his writing was not that much attractive than student A's.
But I think that student B must have scored even better than that of A because his translation was even better than student A, though he did much cuttings.
So student B would have scored 80-82% range while student A would have scored 75-79% in urdu.
So what do you think student A and B would have scored in their Urdu exams?
Suppose there are two students, A and B. Student A had performed not that much perfect as that of B, but still student A's writing was very nice and attractive. Student A didn't make more cuttings than student B. Some of the difficult words which he can't translate into Urdu or English, he still managed by writing it with something. For example in case of elements, the student A wrote 'ejzaa' although in English ejzaa is components.
Student B's way of translation and letter writing was even better than that of A's. But he did make very much cuttings and his writing was not that much attractive than student A's.
But I think that student B must have scored even better than that of A because his translation was even better than student A, though he did much cuttings.
So student B would have scored 80-82% range while student A would have scored 75-79% in urdu.
So what do you think student A and B would have scored in their Urdu exams?