- Messages
- 19
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 13
There a lot of contradictions in details between the two. Which is more reliable?
🚀 NEW from the xtremepape.rs team: AI exam prep — 150,000+ worked solutions, and it marks your handwritten working from a photo. Sign in with your forum account & try it free → prepare.xtremepape.rs
Exactly !!hamidali391 said:Study from both the books. You'll find some direct to the point information in Dr. Iftikhar's book while FNM is more detailed. Surahs and Hadith are not good in both the books. For that acquire the notes of Sir Muzammil.
how can we get sir muzammil's notes???????????hamidali391 said:Study from both the books. You'll find some direct to the point information in Dr. Iftikhar's book while FNM is more detailed. Surahs and Hadith are not good in both the books. For that acquire the notes of Sir Muzammil.
i had already done the work on the book and waiting for it to get publishedsalmanpakrocks said:Don't worry i m working on it !!![]()
hamidali391 said:Sir Muzammil is alot better Islamiat teacher then Dr. Iftikhar is. Basically, Dr.Iftikhar is a Pakistan studies teacher and he is brilliant in that. But I would rate Sir muzammil higher than Dr. Iftikhar. I have studied under both of them so I have a pretty good idea.
@Princess Ashley. There can't be a perfect book. Otherwise, the whole cambridge system will crumble. If you want one book then you should leave Olevels and study in the matric system that has only one single book. Olevels is supposed to develop an interest in research in students. Students are required to study from different books to acquire sufficient knowledge. They don't want the rote system as it is in the matriculation system of Pakistan.
🚀 NEW from the xtremepape.rs team: AI exam prep — 150,000+ worked solutions, and it marks your handwritten working from a photo. Sign in with your forum account & try it free → prepare.xtremepape.rs