We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Oh my god thank you so much. You're an angel. May God bless you. Have a good dayhere you go
View attachment 50659
My question is that my sir said that when we are taking moments at A, there is no need to consider forces at C of AC on BC and vice versa. Why is this so? Why shouldnt we account for forces at C when taking moments at A? Is it bcoz at C, force of AC on AB and AB on AC would be equal and opposite that they would get cancelled. if this is the case, how can we be sure that the 2 forces at C are same?
Thanks
View attachment 50631
I get it. Thanks for your helpYes, that is the case. We are essentially looking at resolved contact forces at C with vertical and horizontal components. Since the horizontal force exerted by one rod is equal and opposite to that of the other rod (action-reaction pair, 3rd Law) and same case for vertical components, the forces gets cancelled and need not to be taken when considering the WHOLE system!
View attachment 51090Cam someone please help me solve this...
thanks you very much
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now