• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

History Notes According To Syllabus

princess Anu

princess Anu

Messages
1,229
Reaction score
740
Points
123
please tell me whats the maximum or minimum numbr of quotes one can mention in an answer?
 
princess Anu

princess Anu

Messages
1,229
Reaction score
740
Points
123
explain how does human and natural factors affect livestock farming? reply wud be appreciated :)
 
Irfan Atique

Irfan Atique

Messages
1,358
Reaction score
1,289
Points
173
sweetiepie said:
I have Made Notes By Myself Just Want To Share With You All Hope Its Helps Everyone And One Thing About Notes Whatever I Have Learnt And Made Am Just posting Soon All Chapters Will Be Availiable :)
Click to expand...
What is your opinion on this question and its answer?

Question: Gandhi had to call off the non-cooperation campaign because of increased violence. Does that means the campaign was a failure? Explain your answer. [14]
Answer: The special session of the congress was held in Calcutta in September 1920 under the President ship of Lajpat Rai to consider the program of non-cooperation presented by Gandhi. Gandhi urged the congress to adopt the policy of progressive non-violent non- cooperation until the wrongs were undone and self-rule or Swaraj was established.
As congress joined Hands with Muslims in the khilaft Movement and Mr. Gandhi started his nonviolent, noncooperation movement against the British, during the period of 1920but there are other factors as well like churi chaura incident due to which Gandhi withdrew, Moplas clash with Hindus completely demolished the movement and finally Kamal Atta Turk abolished the Khilafat for which khilafat movement was started.
Noncooperation movement was nonviolent movement which involved resigning from seats in local bodies, withdrawing children from government schools and boycotting British courts and offices, Non-cooperation movement also involved the refusals to join the armed forces voluntarily and refusing t stand for election. Non-cooperation movement turned out to be a massive violent movement which spread across Indian due to which Gandhi, Ali brothers and other politicians were imprisoned by the British. But before Gandhi could start the movement, there was the tragedy of Chauri Chaura in U.P. on 5 February 1922.
A congress procession of 3000 peasants was fired upon by the police. The angry crowd attacked and burnt the police station causing the death of 22 policemen. Chauri Chaura incident was not the only act of violence committed by the people during the movement. Similar tragic events had already taken place at other places like Bombay and Madras.
The most terrible acts of violence were committed on the Moplahs of Malabar who brutally murdered by Hindus at the time of the visit of Prince of Wales at Bombay.. In mid of August 1921, agrarian riots broke out in Nilambur. The Moplah peasants revolted against the Hindu landlord's oppressive policies, which are in alliance with the British. The Hindu landlords redistributed their lands and the Moplahs, who had been suffering, rose in revolt. A pitched battle between the British regiment and the Moplahs killed several Europeans. Four thousand Moplahs were killed in action and tens of thousands were injured. Gandhi was full of grief at all these happenings. He felt that the movement was losing its non-violent character. He realized the country was not yet ready for a non-violent movement. The sudden withdrawal of the movement came as a shock too many leaders while some had implicit faith in Gandhi; others resented his decision to retreat.
In 1922 the last Ottoman caliph was deprived of political power. The Turkish people under the leadership of Mustafa Kamal Pasha rose in revolt against the Sultan and Captured power and Turkey was declared a secular republic. 2 years later the new ruler of Turkey Kamal Ataturk abolished the Caliphate in 1924 and exiled the Caliph Muhammad VI. It made no difference what Indian Muslims or British politicians wanted because the Turks themselves had abolished the caliphate. Consequently the khilafat Movement in India also came to an end.
The Non-cooperation Movement failed in its main objective. The promise of Swaraj within one year was unrealistic. Even Gandhi admitted that he should not have launched the movement without adequate ground work and proper training of masses in the technique of satyagraha. The introduction of the Khilafat question which was definitely a religious issue, into the national movement was unfortunate and proved ultimately counterproductive. The appeal to the cause of Khilafat issue led to the rise of Muslim fanaticism, creating a great communal divide between Hindus and Muslims. It eventually led to partition of the country.
​
 
Z

ZohaKhan

Messages
220
Reaction score
117
Points
53
Nice work! (y)
can u please provide answer in these form of questions:
Why did montague chlemsford reforms caused so much anger?
why did the lucknow pact came about?
why did the congress opposed morley minto reform of 1909?
Why did the Khilafat Movement fail?
why was the Govt.of India Act of 1935 importnt to the future of sub-cont?

I do have answers but actually they arent according to the C.I.E pattern plus they arent in a suitble text and form.
HELP! :(
 
Z

ZohaKhan

Messages
220
Reaction score
117
Points
53
Nice work! (y)
can u please provide answer in CIE pattern of questions:
Why did montague chlemsford reforms caused so much anger?
why did the lucknow pact came about?
why did the congress opposed morley minto reform of 1909?
Why did the Khilafat Movement fail?
why was the Govt.of India Act of 1935 importnt to the future of sub-cont?

I do have answers but actually they arent according to the C.I.E pattern plus they arent in a suitble text and form.
HELP! :(
 
Irfan Atique

Irfan Atique

Messages
1,358
Reaction score
1,289
Points
173
ZohaKhan said:
Nice work! (y)
can u please provide answer in these form of questions:
Why did montague chlemsford reforms caused so much anger?
why did the lucknow pact came about?
why did the congress opposed morley minto reform of 1909?
Why did the Khilafat Movement fail?
why was the Govt.of India Act of 1935 importnt to the future of sub-cont?

I do have answers but actually they arent according to the C.I.E pattern plus they arent in a suitble text and form.
HELP! :(
Click to expand...
Q: Explain why the Lucknow Pact of 1916 came about.
Answer: Quaid-e-Azam joined Muslim League in 1913 after that he started working for Hindu-Muslim Unity, understanding and for cooperation between Congress and Muslim League.
In 1915, the annual meeting of Congress and Muslim League was held together at Bombay because of Jinnah’s efforts. Then in 1916 as Jinnah persuaded Congress to bring them on the table with Muslim League so in December 1916 had a second meeting in Luck now there an agreement was signed between the Congress and the Muslim League which in the history of the sub-continent in called the Luck now Pact. Through this Pact Muslim and Hindus wanted to work together.
As in 1913 the Muslim League adopted the principal of self-rule which brought the Congress and the Muslim League closer to each other because the Muslims and the Hindus wanted to work out together on the constitutional reforms for the sub-continent. The leader of both parties decided and agreed that they should cooperate with each other to bring the British government around to accept their demands. The Luck now Pact was an agreement on a scheme of constitutional reforms which was agreed upon the Congress and the Muslim League. Both Congress and Muslim League realized that their demands could not be achieved until unless they cooperate with each other to persuade the British government and for the first time in 1916 Congress acknowledged that Muslims have the right to separate electorate and was therefore seen as the beacon of hope for the future of Muslims. They believed that by holding this session of both Congress and Muslim League at one place in Luck now showed Hindu-Muslim unity and produced feelings of good will and friendship
Question: Why did the congress party oppose the Morley Minto reforms of 1909? [7]
Answer: There were several reasons for congress opposition of Morley Minto Reforms 1909. According to these reforms separate electorate was granted for Muslims which the congress did not like. Secondly, since the congress demanded self-rule, it was not satisfied with the very limited powers given to viceroy’s legislative assembly.
The British intended that the Indians could voice their opinions in the councils but the Hindus wanted more responsibility which the government was not prepared to give. This annoyed the Hindus who were looking towards self-rule. The British accepted the right of Muslims to have separate electorates which also annoyed the Hindus who saw it as a concession too far because Congress was in favor of joint electorates. The Congress claimed that it represented all Indian people and that separate electorate was undemocratic. Again self-rule was the goal for the whole country with the Hindus as the dominant force. The Hindus also resented the relative high position of Muslims in the councils despite their much smaller numbers. The method of election was also criticized. The Viceroy’s council had no real power and could only discuss and debate an issue and present their opinion in the form of suggestions. The real power rested with the Viceroy and the Governors of provinces. So on these grounds Congress opposed the Morley-Minto reforms of 1909.
Question: Why did the Khilafat Movement fail?
Answer:
After the First World War, the Ottoman Empire faced dismemberment. Under the leadership of the Ali Brothers Maulana Mohammad Ali and Maulan Shaukat Ali, the Muslims of south Asia launched the Historic Khilafat Movement to try and save it; but the movement was failed because it was not successful and it was not very good.it was failed for number of reasons: Hijrat Movement, Gandhi withdrawal from Non-cooperation Movement because of Chaura Chaurri incident. Gandhi joint hands with the Muslim league in return Gandhi wanted some of the Members of Muslim league to join Congress and Gandhi also promised to start Non-Cooperation movement along with Swaraj Movement which was the movement for self-government.
With the passage of time as the movement goes on an incident took place between 1921to 1922 known as Chaurra Chaurri incident in which the violent groups surrounded the police station at Chaura Chaurri and burnt the polices station in which 22 police men were burnt alive and there were other many violent incidents. Gandhi decided that the Sawraj Movement was becoming too violent following the Chaura Chaurri and withdrew his support. In 1920, the Muslims migration to Afghanistan happened. The Muslim league opposed this, wanting Muslims to stay and fight for their own cause. The Migration was a failure. The Afghan government was hostile to the migrants, who on their return found their homes and jobs occupied which dispirited the Muslims.
Finally in 1924 the new Turkish government (Mustafa Kamal Ataturk) abolished the caliphate, so ending the movement.
 
Z

ZohaKhan

Messages
220
Reaction score
117
Points
53
in desperate need of the answer of the question:
Why did montague chlemsford reforms caused so much anger?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top