How was physics paper 33

[Knight]

How was physics paper 33

 

[Scafalon40]

Hell

 

[trgirl]

Hell

how was the questions i m gonna take it in 1 hour?

 

[crazy123]

mannn it was tough... i just couldnt get the graph right..

 

[Knight]

finished the paper easily in 2 hours...
but there were some complications...

 

[Knight]

mannn it was tough... i just couldnt get the graph right..

me too

 

[crazy123]

the 2nd qs was easy though..

 

[Scafalon40]

And again I say: it was Hell.

 

[mujtabashahnawaz]

What was the gradient? Mine came in ''negative''

 

[xxfarhaxx]

graph...da scle ws crap..jst cudnt gt it ryt!!!

 

[xxfarhaxx]

What was the gradient? Mine came in ''negative''

i gt a postive bt diff ppl hav gt diff ones!!!

 

[Ahmed Tariq]

The gradient had to be positive. Confirmed. Mine was 0.172 and I used grams and metres. But then again, I might be wrong.

 

[mujtabashahnawaz]

The gradient had to be positive. Confirmed. Mine was 0.172 and I used grams and metres. But then again, I might be wrong.

The gradient had to be negative, no way it could have been positive, as we had to use 1/m on x axis not simply ''m''. I used kg and m

 

[crazy123]

Mine was +ve as well but i had a really hard tym plotting the graph.... my values just didnt seem 2 have an obvious trend... =(

 

[Knight]

The gradient had to be negative, no way it could have been positive, as we had to use 1/m on x axis not simply ''m''. I used kg and m

the gradient had to be negative, but i took mass in grams..lol

 

[Ahmed Tariq]

As 1/m increased, h0-h/m also increased. Hence, the positive gradient. Confirmed with my teacher.

 

[Knight]

As 1/m increased, h0-h/m also increased. Hence, the positive gradient. Confirmed with my teacher.

as m increases 1/m decreases....

 

[Ahmed Tariq]

as m increases 1/m decreases....

And as 1/m decreased, ho-h/m also decreased.

 

[crazy123]

well +ve or -ve it still was crap...

 

[ramith]

my gradient was 0.19...