- Messages
- 134
- Reaction score
- 30
- Points
- 38
you dont keep frequency constant. thats the factor on which the height of the ring depends.
i know i kept current constant..someone told me dat frequency was contant and i got confused.
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
you dont keep frequency constant. thats the factor on which the height of the ring depends.
got - 1.02current, number of turns in coil and voltage
for question 2 y-intercept = -0.5
what about you?
No, remember in the graph of x-axis they wrote x10^-3. I just took the values of 1/f. Didn't put x10^-3 with it, so?so many? are you serious? :O
the weird thing for me was that the error in y-intercept was like +-2 which is greater than the actual value of y-intercept -0.5i
got - 1.02
I got 1.04 +-1 :s the heck
the weird thing for me was that the error in y-intercept was like +-2 which is greater than the actual value of y-intercept -0.5
but now that i think about it this is possible in certain circumstances but how was i supposed to write it down
-0.5+-2.0????? lol this looks ................................................
for those who got negative y-intercept, didnt you face a similar problem(error>than best value)?
the weird thing for me was that the error in y-intercept was like +-2 which is greater than the actual value of y-intercept -0.5
but now that i think about it this is possible in certain circumstances but how was i supposed to write it down
-0.5+-2.0????? lol this looks ................................................
for those who got negative y-intercept, didnt you face a similar problem(error>than best value)?
i got y intercept of -0.6 and uncertainty of 2.02 .. close enough!I got -0.64 y intercept and uncertainty 2.19
i got 252.. well.. i hope that it's within the rangeWhat was the frequency for the 2nd last quextion? 256?
same here i got itercept -0.92 and and uncertainity -2.67 or smthng i think we did smthng wrong else how can uncertainity be greater than the actual vale?the weird thing for me was that the error in y-intercept was like +-2 which is greater than the actual value of y-intercept -0.5
but now that i think about it this is possible in certain circumstances but how was i supposed to write it down
-0.5+-2.0????? lol this looks ................................................
for those who got negative y-intercept, didnt you face a similar problem(error>than best value)?
Not possible. They'll cut one or two marks.. they'll see our method for errors and all.
i got 252.. well.. i hope that it's within the range
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now