How was your Mathematics syllabus D paper 1?

[rackstagryan]

0.95

and 2.8

i duss ur wrng buddy
t'was 0.98

 

[rackstagryan]

wasn't it 0.95 m? I could be wrong though.

ur wrng by .032 i gess!!!!!!!
as far as i knw

 

[rackstagryan]

silver slick wat question r u tlkin bout
Car question????
i'm beginning 2 f worried mn
temme sooon

 

[mastermindh]

Isosceles Trapezium was the right answer :

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120114152331AAZJIOi

So was kite...

 

[Minnie]

but kite has rotational symmetry of order 2 I confirmed it pata nahi I am leaving it on Allah

we could draw a trapezium or a kite. both are correct.

 

[Fallen316]

Isosceles Trapezium was the right answer :

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120114152331AAZJIOi

according to your link:
it is said to have rotational symmetry of order 1
This is just a fancy way of saying "no rotational symmetry"
the same applies to KITE.
Thus, both are correct.

 

[mastermindh]

according to your link:
it is said to have rotational symmetry of order 1
This is just a fancy way of saying "no rotational symmetry"
the same applies to KITE.
Thus, both are correct.

Good Sir....

 

[hashim2]

can anybody plz explain the possible marking scheme of the freq polygon question? i didn't take the midpoints so how many marks will i lose?

 

[pakiboy]

can anybody plz explain the possible marking scheme of the freq polygon question? i didn't take the midpoints so how many marks will i lose?

me did same i thnk it will only cost us 0.5 mark to 1 mark!!!!!!

 

[moiz 95]

guys chill....kite and trapezium both are correct.
* 0.95 and 2.9
*probab was 8/15
* in case of error carried forward only one mark is to be loosed so chill nd concentrate on p2....

 

[pakiboy]

can anybody plz explain the possible marking scheme of the freq polygon question? i didn't take the midpoints so how many marks will i lose?

its 0.5 mark for plotting correct heights which we did 0.5 mark for choosing scale...... which we did........... 0.5 mark for making straight lines......which we did and finally 0.5 mark for correct midpoints chosen....... so we only losing 0.5 mark and if your rest of your paper was correct that 0.5 mark will rounded so no worry dude............. Allah is surely with us...............

 

[pakisatan123]

its 0.5 mark for plotting correct heights which we did 0.5 mark for choosing scale...... which we did........... 0.5 mark for making straight lines......which we did and finally 0.5 mark for correct midpoints chosen....... so we only losing 0.5 mark and if your rest of your paper was correct that 0.5 mark will rounded so no worry dude............. Allah is surely with us...............

werent we supposed to draw histogram and join mid points

 

[moiz 95]

werent we supposed to draw histogram and join mid points

yup.

 

[hashim2]

its 0.5 mark for plotting correct heights which we did 0.5 mark for choosing scale...... which we did........... 0.5 mark for making straight lines......which we did and finally 0.5 mark for correct midpoints chosen....... so we only losing 0.5 mark and if your rest of your paper was correct that 0.5 mark will rounded so no worry dude............. Allah is surely with us...............

thanks a lot but can u further explain correct heights and correct scale. My scale was 2 cm for 1.

 

[mastermindh]

Not a simple trapezium I guess......
It doesnt have any line of symmetry.....

 

[syedhamza]

Guys Isosceles trapezium is ok .but other trapeziums aren't possible.
And the thing is that isoceles triangle was the wrong ans in that polygon qs. It should be equilateral

 

[Shehan Livera]

Not a simple trapezium I guess......
It doesnt have any line of symmetry.....

Yes. It is right, only if you have drawn a isosceles trapezium.

 

[Rimi]

werent we supposed to draw histogram and join mid points

we had to make a frequency polygon XD Not an histogram!

 

[syedhamza]

Did u all started ur graph with origin?

 

[syedhamza]

I mean frequencypolygon