• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Mathematics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
463
Reaction score
549
Points
103
Messages
463
Reaction score
549
Points
103
i - okay first notice that the question gave you the base area( m^2) and the rate of flow in m^3 so when making the formula you divide 30 by 1000 to get the rate of increase in height
so now you have dh/dt =0.03 -k square root h
put h =1 and dh/dt = 0.02
0.02 = o.o3 - k ( square root of 1 is 1)
k = 0.03 -0.02 = 0.01
so now the equation is
dh/dt =0.03 - 0.01 square root h
by taking 0.01 as a common factor
dh/dt= 0.01 (3- square root h)
ii- this part is integration , u have the equation
( x-3 ) dx/dt =0.005 x ( divide both sides by o.oo5 x and put the integration sign)
(x- 3)/ 0.005x dx= dt ( you multiply both sides by dt)
separate the left side
x/ 0.005 x - 3/0.005x dx = dt
200 -600/x dx = dt ( now u can integrate)
200x - 600 ln (x) = t +c
put x=3 , t= 0
600 - 600 ln(3) = c
thus t = 200x - 600 ln (x) - 600+ 600 ln (3)
t= 200x + 600 ln (3/x) - 600 ( u can take 200 as common factor )
t = 200 (x + 3 ln (3/x) -3)
 
Messages
463
Reaction score
549
Points
103
i - okay first notice that the question gave you the base area( m^2) and the rate of flow in m^3 so when making the formula you divide 30 by 1000 to get the rate of increase in height
so now you have dh/dt =0.03 -k square root h
put h =1 and dh/dt = 0.02
0.02 = o.o3 - k ( square root of 1 is 1)
k = 0.03 -0.02 = 0.01
so now the equation is
dh/dt =0.03 - 0.01 square root h
by taking 0.01 as a common factor
dh/dt= 0.01 (3- square root h)
ii- this part is integration , u have the equation
( x-3 ) dx/dt =0.005 x ( divide both sides by o.oo5 x and put the integration sign)
(x- 3)/ 0.005x dx= dt ( you multiply both sides by dt)
separate the left side
x/ 0.005 x - 3/0.005x dx = dt
200 -600/x dx = dt ( now u can integrate)
200x - 600 ln (x) = t +c
put x=3 , t= 0
600 - 600 ln(3) = c
thus t = 200x - 600 ln (x) - 600+ 600 ln (3)
t= 200x + 600 ln (3/x) - 600 ( u can take 200 as common factor )
t = 200 (x + 3 ln (3/x) -3)

iii- here there's a trick , notice the question said the height of water is 4 m
so u go back to the equation x= 3- square root h and put h =4
then u get x = 3- 2 = 1
put this x in the equation obtained in part (ii)
t= 200 (1 + 3 ln(3/1) - 3)
t= 259.2 seconds
 
Messages
137
Reaction score
9
Points
18
iii- here there's a trick , notice the question said the height of water is 4 m
so u go back to the equation x= 3- square root h and put h =4
then u get x = 3- 2 = 1
put this x in the equation obtained in part (ii)
t= 200 (1 + 3 ln(3/1) - 3)
t= 259.2 seconds


thank you so much!!! really helped :)
 
Messages
324
Reaction score
24
Points
28
This is so hard i cant understnd a thing...... can any 1 explain me this im in need of serious help!!!!!

doubt.jpg

Please help me solve this question .....
THIS IS 2011 OCT/NOVEMBER
STATISTICS PAPER 62
 
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Points
1
How to solve this, 2-3x < |x-3|? The answer should be x > -1/2 only. This is from CIE Past Year Mathematics. Oct/Nov 09. Question 1. Variant 31
 
Messages
681
Reaction score
438
Points
73
you have to find the probabilities of the other 7 integers which will be 1-(1/10) / 7. this is because the proabilities of all the other integers are equal. now the formula for expectance is sum of (X x P) . so multiply the variable X (eg -2) with its probability (9/70) and then add them all.
 
Messages
156
Reaction score
11
Points
18
The square root is not that terrible. It is just used to compensate certain squares.
Also to solve this question I think you need to master the trigonometric identities.
View attachment 7343
Thank you so much.Really helped a lot.
Could you also please explain the second question of the same paper?
I did the first step,that is,simplifying it with logarithm but then substituting the values using the graph and then solving it led to many errors.Have seen a similar question in p2 and so I will bother you with some p2 questions as well.:)
 
Messages
260
Reaction score
104
Points
53
Thank you so much.Really helped a lot.
Could you also please explain the second question of the same paper?
I did the first step,that is,simplifying it with logarithm but then substituting the values using the graph and then solving it led to many errors.Have seen a similar question in p2 and so I will bother you with some p2 questions as well.:)
y = A (x^n), natural log each side to get
ln y = ln A + n (ln x)
The gradient is n and y-intercept is ln A.
Just draw the line of best fit to find the two values. It should not be hard.
 
Top