• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Mathematics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
1,476
Reaction score
1,893
Points
173
guyz anyone can help with this its pretty easy just not to my brain r8 now .. here is it just part b ! =p
Two particles A and B are moving on a smooth horizontal plane. The mass of A is km,
where 2 <
k < 3 , and the mass of B is m. The particles are moving along the same straight
line, but in opposite directions, and they collide directly. Immediately before they collide
the speed of
A is 2u and the speed of B is 4u. As a result of the collision the speed of A is
halved and its direction of motion is reversed.
(a) Find, in terms of
k and u, the speed of B immediately after the collision.
(b) State whether the direction of motion of
B changes as a result of the collision,explaining your answer.
(a)
m(A)u(A) + m(B)u(B) = m(A)v(A) + m(B)v(B)
(km)(2u) + (m)(-4u) = (km)(-u) + (m)v(B)
Eliminating m from both sides
2ku - 4u = -ku + v(B)
3ku - 4u = v(B)
v(B) = u(3k - 4)

(b)
We know that k lies in between 2 and 3, so lets assume k = 2.5
v(B) = u(3(2.5) - 4)
v(B) = u(7.5 - 4)
v(B) = 3.5u

v(B) is positive
and it was initially negative so
the direction changes
:)
 
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
1,893
Points
173
Winter 2009 P31

http://www.xtremepapers.com/CIE/index.php?dir=International A And AS Level/9709 - Mathematics/&file=9709_w09_qp_31.pdf

Question 7 - Part 4 . I know the first inequality. Not sure about the Arg one.

Help, when you get some spare time please.
For the second inequality, sketch a half line with argument (1/4)π but in the second quadrant because the argument should start with u as the starting point
The shaded region is between this line and the first inequality
 

Attachments

  • argand locus.png
    argand locus.png
    11.6 KB · Views: 22
Messages
940
Reaction score
1,024
Points
103
(a)
m(A)u(A) + m(B)u(B) = m(A)v(A) + m(B)v(B)
(km)(2u) + (m)(-4u) = (km)(-u) + (m)v(B)
Eliminating m from both sides
2ku - 4u = -ku + v(B)
3ku - 4u = v(B)
v(B) = u(3k - 4)

(b)
We know that k lies in between 2 and 3, so lets assume k = 2.5
v(B) = u(3(2.5) - 4)
v(B) = u(7.5 - 4)
v(B) = 3.5u

v(B) is positive so,
direction does not change
:)

apreaciate it .. but yo how did you know k lies bet 2 & 3 ???
 
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
1,893
Points
173
lol ^ ^^^
ya man just saw it .. but where the explain part ?
Wait wait wait the direction changes as B was initially negative and now its positive i have edited my answer check it out!

And the explanation required is given!
 
Messages
158
Reaction score
56
Points
38
For the second inequality, sketch a half line with argument (1/4)π but in the second quadrant because the argument should start with u as the starting point
The shaded region is between this line and the first inequality
The first inequality actually makes a vertical line at x = 1 right? I think in your diagram you considered 2 to be the y coordinate by mistake. Also, in your diagram you started the arg angle from the origin. I thought I should start the angle line from ( -2, 1 ) and focus it towards the right till it intersects my vertical x line? That triangle would represent my inequality right?

I've attached a sort of rough sketch. Its quite terrible, I know. Is that how its suppose to look and I assume that I should join the coordinate from u till it touches my vertical line to make my base aswell so it can be a complete triangle which represents the shaded area?
 

Attachments

  • arg.PNG
    arg.PNG
    5.6 KB · Views: 12
Messages
207
Reaction score
500
Points
73
S1 may/june 2010 varient 2 ... question 7 ... part iv and v ? how do u do it ? and please explain the basic concept behind it :/...,thanks
 
Messages
463
Reaction score
549
Points
103
can someone please explain how to solve this question
 

Attachments

  • maths question1.docx
    155.3 KB · Views: 11
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Points
1
why is the angle twice the angle of arg of z......whats the reason.. cant get it .............in nov 2003 q 7 part 3
 
Messages
165
Reaction score
109
Points
43
Messages
4,609
Reaction score
3,903
Points
323
(1+ax)^6

1 + (ax)(6) + [(ax)^2(6)(5)]/2 + [(ax)^3(6)(5)(4)]/6

The coefficient of 'x' is -30.

6ax = -30x
6a = -30
a = -5

To find the coefficient of 'x^3', substitute the value of 'a = -5' in the equation ' [(ax)^3(6)(5)(4)]/6''.

[(ax)^3(6)(5)(4)]/6
[(5x)^3(6)(5)(4)]/6
-2500x^3

Therefore, the coefficient of 'x^3' is '-2500''.


Thank you :) but how did you do the highlighted part?
 
Messages
165
Reaction score
109
Points
43
please someone help me with p3 nov 2004 q 9 part 2.........cant get it......thanks


r = 2i - j + 4k + s ( i + j - k)

As PQ is perpendicular to 'l', the dot product of PQ and 'l' will be equal to 0.

PQ . l = 0

Now we've to find the direction vector of PQ.

PQ = OQ - OP
PQ = (2i +0j - k) - OP

OP lies on 'l' therefore OP = 2i - j + 4k + s ( i + j - k).

OP = 2i - j + 4k + s ( i + j - k)
OP = (2 + s)i + (-1+s)j + (4-s)k

PQ = (2i - k) - OP
PQ = (2i + 0j - k) - (2 + s)i + (-1+s)j + (4-s)k
PQ = (-t)i + (1-t)j + (-5+t)k

Find out the value of 't' by equating the dot product of 'PQ' and 'l' to '0'

PQ . l = 0
(-t)i + (1-t)j + (-5+t)k . (1)i + (1)j + (-1)k = 0
- s + 1 - s + 5 - s = 0
6 = 3s
2 = s

Put the value of 's=2' in the equation 'OP = (2 + s)i + (-1+s)j + (4-s)k' to find the position vector of P.

OP = (2 + s)i + (-1+s)j + (4-s)k
OP = (2 + 2)i + (-1+2)j + (4-2)k
OP = 4i + 1j + 2k

Therefore, the position vector of 'P' is '4i + 1j + 2k'.
 
Messages
165
Reaction score
109
Points
43
Thank you :) but how did you do the highlighted part?

Using the formula of binomial expansion.

(1 + x)^n = 1 + [(x)( n )]/1 + [(x)^2]( n )(n-1)]/[(1)(2)] + [(x)^3]( n )(n-1)(n-2)]/[(1)(2)(3)] +[(x)^4]( n )(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)]/[(1)(2)(3)(4)] ........
 
Messages
165
Reaction score
109
Points
43
why is the angle twice the angle of arg of z......whats the reason.. cant get it .............in nov 2003 q 7 part 3

I don't think that they've asked us to explain why is the angle twice the angle of arg z; In Q7(iii) N03 P3, they've asked us to find the greatest value of arg s for points on this locus. Are you referring to the same question?
 
Top