- Messages
- 31
- Reaction score
- 25
- Points
- 28
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
You can use any arbitrary value of x as the initial value, whatever initial value you use the answer will converge to 1.35.For the topic - Numerical solutions of Equations. Can someone tell me how do I determine the initial value if it is not given in the question?
For example:
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/...S Level/Mathematics (9709)/9709_s11_qp_32.pdf
Q4(ii)
Thanks !
Hi, can anyone help me with this question? Any help would be appreciated
From 0-2 seconds, both particles are travelling with the same acceleration in opposite directions. At 2 seconds the blue particle hits the ground and comes to rest, while the red particle's velocity begins to decrease due to its weight because the string has become slack. At 2.5 seconds its velocity reaches 0 and it begins to fall downwards. At 3 seconds the string gets taut again as calculated in (ii) so the blue particle feels an upward tension and begins to move again. From this point onwards we are not required to show the subsequent motion in the graph.
Mechanics Question
part (iii) please someone help me in sketching this ! .. I'm so confused because of the marking scheme answer ..
this is May/June 2002 P4 9709
Thanks so much you're awesomeView attachment 50580 From 0-2 seconds, both particles are travelling with the same acceleration in opposite directions. At 2 seconds the blue particles hits the ground and comes to rest, while the red particle's velocity begins to decrease due to its weight because the string has become slack. At 2.5 seconds its velocity reaches 0 and it begins to fall downwards. At 3 seconds the string gets taut again as calculated in (ii) so the blue particle feels an upward tension and begins to move again. From this point onwards we are not required to show the subsequent motion in the graph.
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Mathematics (9709)/9709_w10_qp_43.pdf
Q3 can someone please explain part (i)
I still didn't get it can you please explain in a more detailed way ? .. or another wayView attachment 50634 View attachment 50635
Here you Go!
Adding the two equal Tension vectors by the cosine rule gives the resultant which can then be used to find the Tension!
Okay hmmm lets see... As we know that the system is in equilibrium, this means that the resultant of all of the forces = zero. We also know that the force exerted on the pulley by the string is 3*3^(1/2). This means that the force exerted on the string by the pulley is also 3*3^(1/2) ( because the system is in equilibrium! the two forces are equal and opposite). Now this force is the resultant of the two tensions in the string which are coloured blue in my diagram. Adding the two Tensions by the vector triangle and using the cosine rule enables us to find the Tension. If you still dont understand i will be happy to make another diagram! Hope you get itI still didn't get it can you please explain in a more detailed way ? .. or another way
I'm sorry for wasting your time, well I got everything but when it comes to the diagram I didn't get itOkay hmmm lets see... As we know that the system is in equilibrium, this means that the resultant of all of the forces = zero. We also know that the force exerted on the pulley by the string is 3*3^(1/2). This means that the force exerted on the string by the pulley is also 3*3^(1/2) ( because the system is in equilibrium! the two forces are equal and opposite). Now this force is the resultant of the two tensions in the string which are coloured blue in my diagram. Adding the two Tensions by the vector triangle and using the cosine rule enables us to find the Tension. If you still dont understand i will be happy to make another diagram! Hope you get it
Don't worry, i love helping out others and doing math. I Hope you get it now! Btw Are you in AS Level or A2?I'm sorry for wasting your time, well I got everything but when it comes to the diagram I didn't get it
A2Don't worry, i love helping out others and doing math. I Hope you get it now! Btw Are you in AS Level or A2?
ohhhh .. I got it now .. such question met me before .. can I know why can't we divide the 3x (3)^1/2 by 2 and thats it ?? .. and thanks in advance for your help ^_^View attachment 50641
Sorry I forgot to attach it!
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now