- Messages
- 265
- Reaction score
- 76
- Points
- 38
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
in part iv can we write answer without using graph??
Q.7 How to find x-co-ordinate of D?
Saad Mughal
In Linear Law questions, Do we always get the y-intercept from the graph, or can we also using (x,y) and gradient to get it?
Saad Mughal
In Linear Law questions, Do we always get the y-intercept from the graph, or can we also using (x,y) and gradient to get it?
You can use any of the two. It depends on how easy which method is to apply in the particular question.
Just hoping that Linear law GRAPHS don't come. They can be so tedious and error-prone sometimes.
ok, but why you finding unit vector was not velocity vector = speed x direction (which is given)find unit vector in direction 3i+4j
then multiply it with speed 20kph to get velocity vector
what is the area of trapezium?
I did the same. But I don't get the logic of the multiplication.
The direction and Cartesian plane method is more logical.
In this question we have to first calculate the angle for 3i and 4j as tan(inverse) 4 divided by3. we'll get the velocity vector this way and then we'll multiply iit with t to getits position.
I know that and I'm saying that this is the proper and logical method of doing this.
In the other method, where we calculate the unit vector of the direction and multiply by the speed to get the velocity vector is illogical.
I know that and I'm saying that this is the proper and logical method of doing this.
In the other method, where we calculate the unit vector of the direction and multiply by the speed to get the velocity vector is illogical.
well, i never knew the other method so how did it go today?
These vectors ae just unut vectors which show direction. We need to find vector. Thats why we multiply so magnitude of vector is same as the magnitude given.I did the same. But I don't get the logic of the multiplication.
The direction and Cartesian plane method is more logical.
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now