- Messages
- 2,515
- Reaction score
- 4,065
- Points
- 273
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
It was 1 i think,cuz i remember equation being 2y>=x+2 applying to that line...it wasnt 2.wasnt y intercept 1
It was 2y>x+2the gradient was i guess, 0.5 and y-intercept was 2. so the eq was this : y=0.5x+2. so when multiplied by 2, it is: 2y= x+4 so the inequality was 2y<= x+4 I'm not quite sure it is correct. But I did the same!
the f inverse question?q6 final last part.
I did it y>1/2X + 1 ........ WRONG?It was 2y>x+2
nope thts exactly what i did.....I did it y>1/2X + 1 ........ WRONG?
X+2/3the f inverse question?
remind me what was the QUESTION?what was that comment in 2nd last Q?
oops sorry this one.last part of q6.the f inverse question?
Acha what is the final answer for the time wala? 11 03?
I wrote freq. of girls is more variable than that of boys .remind me what was the QUESTION?
FREQUENCY POLYGON: Girls have a less spread than boys in terms of time taken!
saray :/ I couldnt recheck whole ppr :/***amd***, Paper main kitne marks doubt pe hain? mere almost 6!
Its fine!I wrote freq. of girls is more variable than that of boys .
saray :/ I couldnt recheck whole ppr :/
and your number of rational symmetry wasnt right ,-, it was 3
oops sorry this one.last part of q6.
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now